I did read the whole post, this is probably the main reason I never get around to posting my own stuff.
I have to say that the author does give some solid advise, if your goal is to grasp the attention of the millennial era, gold fish attention spanned, internet zombies of today. Although I find it interesting that probably non of that target audience could be bothered to read such a post in it's entirety. Which makes me wonder if his/her intention was to enlighten quality posters on the fine arts of reeling in the zombified masses.
If that was his/her intention, a solid 90-100% upvote is due. But one must factor in the amount of reward pool that has been delegated through bribery via means of paid upvotes. This looks to be somewhere in the area of 180sbd spent, ouch that hurts the reward pool, so maybe 0-10% upvote depending on how ones thoughts are about bid bots. But alas humor must be factored into all this and this post did arise some decent chuckles that's worth at least 20%.
My final analysis would be this post is worth a 20-30% upvote from you @dj123 assuming he responds. Not that anyone cares less what I think, but there you have it. But personally I only have the ability to give 0% or 100% upvotes, I'm going to give a 100% upvote in hopes that my @$$ doesn't get flagged. :P
Enjoy my 1 cent upvote @yallapapi, I know that you put some quality time and energy into this post, and I enjoyed reading it. I just really can't stand what bid bots are doing to our system here. I don't blame you for using them though, seems that everyone and their dog are taking to bribery. "When in Rome" I suppose, turns out I'm just a $#!t Roman.
lol actually agree more with your reply than the post, you gotta do one on how to evaluate a Steemit post or something
I may do that.