Finally discover the six must-have features of quality content.
"I still don't understand what quality content is."
That's a comment I saw on a Steemit post in the past week. The person who said it has been around for at least two months and has been active both writing and commenting. I found it a bit distressing because it shouldn't take that long to figure out what it is. But the trouble is, when you ask what it is, it's hard to find a simple answer. It seems like the famous saying, "I can't define it, but I know it when I see it."
There's more to it than just writing well without typos or poor grammar (you should always do that). But what else should a quality post include?
It's a problem beyond Steemit. Anyone who publishes content on the web faces the same question. So I went on a mission to define it for bloggers, especially those on this platform.
Who's the judge?
Who is it that decides what quality content is, and what it isn't? That's the first question I needed to answer. And guess what I found? Almost every resource or authority site on developing good content referred to Google. I'm talking about big names like Forbes, Content Marketing Institute, Hubspot, Kissmetrics and LifeHack.org. Of course, each of them had their own spin on the topic.
But it seems that what makes Google happy, will also make readers happy. At least that is Google's goal, and the reason they have such an impact on what people consider to be quality content.
What I did next was comb through a bunch of the articles looking for commonalities. I pulled out the following list of attributes everyone seemed to agree makes quality content.
It must be original
Original is defined as:
Created personally by a particular artist, writer, musician, etc.; not a copy.
Whatever content you create needs to meet this definition. You need to create it. That doesn't mean you can't be inspired by someone, or even use them as a reference (properly sourced of course). But the content you post needs to have originated from your own mind, in your own words, images, music or video. It's just that simple.
Be informative
The best content serves a purpose. It answers a question, solves a problem, inspires, or entertains. You want to add value to the community or the subject you're writing about (or creating videos for).
People want to hear what you have to say, but say it in a focused way. Rambling about your grocery list probably isn't something that adds value - unless it's a humorous story that will entertain. The point is that posts don't need to be research papers to offer value, but they do need to have a purpose.
Make it "long enough"
How long is long enough is a question everyone asks. There is no absolute answer in terms of the number of words or video length. The content should be long enough to make your point while keeping the reader/viewer engaged.
The trouble is that it will vary by topic, the purpose of the post, the audience, the expertise of the author and even change over time. But while there are no firm numbers to go by, you can gauge what it should be by doing a little research on other posts on your topic.
The one thing that is universally agreed is you should never "fluff" your content to make it longer just for the sake of making it longer (to meet some arbitrary word count for example).
Always cite your sources
If you make reference to any outside sources, you need to link to them or give them appropriate credit. Citing your sources actually gives you more credibility.
How you do that is up to you. For example, you can use an in text reference such as "Dr. Acme, in an interview with the ABC newspaper..." This tells the reader immediately who and what your source is. Also, including a link to the source is good practice.
Alternatively, some people include links at the end of their posts or videos which is also acceptable.
Of course, if you're posting a complete work of fiction, poetry or personal experience, then sourcing isn't necessary unless you rely on a source somewhere in your content.
Include some visual content
According to Forbes, "visual content outperforms text-only content in terms of attracting inbound links, social media shares, time spent on page, and engagement."
Using images or video in your content almost always makes it more enjoyable for the reader which leads to a higher perceived quality. A massive block of text can be quite intimidating, even if it is formatted well for the web.
And if you use video, also remember to include some text. Describe your video, give it a proper introduction, or include other relevant facts. When you do so, you'll make everyone (or as close to everyone as you can) happy because some people won't watch videos - or they can't at that moment.
Format it for the web
Reading on electronic devices is hard on the eyes. So have some sympathy for your readers and use short paragraphs of 3-5 sentences. Include a line break between paragraphs (hit enter between them). Break up your post into sections using subheadings that describe the content as well as support skimming.
Also, remember many people are reading on mobile devices where even short paragraphs can appear long on small screens. Stick to just a few sentences though, and your post should be easy enough to read on any screen.
Is that it?
There's plenty of room for argument about other attributes quality content should have. The six I chose are the core ones I think you should strive for in every post.
What do you think? Did I pick the right ones? How do you define quality content?
@ntowl , The Night Owl Writer
“We have loved the stars too fondly to be afraid of the night.” - the old astronomer
@hyperfundit Great project glad I got to meet you in Las Vegas.
@hyperfundit...some of us were struggle in writing post...but i guess you have inspire us on what to write and how to write them..thank you
@thetruth36, thanks Lorry!
Great meeting you too! Excited for the next local SteemitLA meetup so we can link up again :)
please upvote
If you like uniuqe you might want to catch up on my Dystopian Short Stories plus my Novel being written on the Steem blockchain.
That is unique enough and I am always looking for narrators to create the Short Stories into AudioBooks.
You heard about DBooks yet? I'm actually a narrator:
Nice idea about posting an audio sample of your book on Youtube. I did the same with mine.
Yeah, but I wasn't trying to spam with mine, the guy was looking for a narrator.
Have you tried to recreate your voice in https://lyrebird.ai. You can use the engine to instantly turn the text to speech.
Oh man, that's terrifying. I knew there was an "audioshop" type of program out there, but that site is so simple. Do you have links to samples you've done?
I'd rather not give away my voice online, but you can look at their reconstructions of Donald Trump and Barack Obama's voices. https://lyrebird.ai/demo/
I'm glad they suck right now. My novel actually features the use of some of this type of technology within the context of the story. Possible future political ramifications are disturbing to think about.
Being a talented writer is not something we get used to be. It has to be practiced everytime to enhance this talent. Michael Jordan didn't start to be most valuable player but rather he step on the ladder of success. He put his sweat, blood, nightless sleep, hunger to sacrifice for his success. Hard work really pays off in the end. Other people call it overnight success but we didnt see the picture behind of this overnight success, it is composed of all sacrifices. Thanks for this valuable post as always @hyperfundit
I agree. That's why we need sort of guidelines on how to enhance and be better in our crafts. We can write whatever we want but to be technical about it takes practice and time.
You did a pretty good job. I was struggling with this question myself. Thanks for putting some light on the subject.
Well this is of the most difficult questions to answer.
Some posts may be rubbish for one person, but a gold mine for another!
I do think that using images, text formatting, chapters and so on will be regardless of the content of the article a big plus for the post.
But according to me the quality should be searched within the content. I do admit that not all my posts are quality post, while I do normally use formatting and images!
I do write about three niches namely Steem related, Crypto related and sports (betting) related. So my group of followers is a quite deverse group!
If I do write about Steem, regardless of the quality, I will have a bigger chance that it will interest people!
If I do write about crypto related stuff, probably some followers who are interested in the sports part will skip the post!
If I do write about sports betting, it does get really interesting! The one who do follow me for the steem content and crypto content, will, regardless of the quality of the post, consider is useless post! While the sports betting community could find it a real hidden gem!@hyperfundit @ntowl
So quality content could not be judged by the number upvotes of styling of the post. Quality cannot be measured by the number of comments neither! Strange isn't it! To give you an example I am running a world cup contest and the registration post has now more than 330 comments attached to it, the post did got resteemed 5 or 6 times! Does this make it a great post full of quality? No! But it does offer a window to write quality articles about it :)
According to me the quality of a post is a personal thingy and for sure is niche related!
I do think however that the author could get an idea of the quality of the post by receiving meaningful and genuine comments !about the content of the post!
But hey, that's my vision about quality of postings!
Now I will let the community decide if this was a quality comment and just like written above the community will decide on the quality and I will get an idea by the number of replies of this comment!
Thanks for giving me a platform to express myself!
Cheers,
Peter
I am the community and I saw this is quality comment lol!
I share about photo and food and travel. Those are the topics I can have something more to say although at times I am at loss for words.
Just like you I do read more posts than I comment or upvote.
We all are the community and within there are subgroups all with the opinions, ideas and so on!Thanks @leeart
That is what makes this incredible. There are a lot of things more that we can offer.
I think some people are naturally talented in writing. Unfortunately, I am not that one! It's tough!
Me neither, it sucks!
Confidence and believing in yourself could make a huge difference though! 🙌🏼
I need this article for making my post at least good. Resteemed for future references. thank you @hyperfundit
indeed quality writing also requires to buy votes
Lolz.
Truefact fact bro.
In this end-time world of Steemit your money/popularity determines if your post is quality or not.
Bot upvote is now the order of the day
thank you so much for your nice information
good information as we are all dependent on it it is great to read an article related to this
Nice summary of basic points which are sometimes easy to forget. Well done.
I have personally been in the writing and publishing industry for over 30 years. I have worked with writers, taught and coached writers, and befriended writers. This cross-section of comments is quite typical for what I have heard for years. Some crying about the unfairness of it all. "Oh she can afford to hire a publicist." "Oh he knew someone in NYC and got a contract." "I just can't write." And on and on and on. While those who get where they are going just keep plodding on one step at a time, willing to be a part of whatever system is operating at the time. (Within reason of course.)
Never can I remember not paying out a LOT of money to promote my books (my writing). I still do. And now I'm doing it on Steemit. And I don't mind because I feel I have something to say. And I feel what I have to say will help someone along the way. And I think buying bots is just a great way of doing that.
I've poured my life's blood out in social media for years. Spent a fortune on Facebook ads, etc. Never went anywhere. But on Steemit, it's totally different.
I love Steemit and am SO thankful to have found it.
And on another note -- stories are everywhere of the "editor" who turned down a book that later became a bestseller. That author didn't sit and cry. Or it never would have become a bestseller. That author realized that was just one person's opinion and moved forward. Same thing here. If this is where you have chosen to park and stay for a while. Practice writing. Write. Post. And keep plodding on. And enjoy the ride!
I absolutely agree with u
Totally agree with you @norma-jean!
I have to sound spammy by saying I agree because you have said what I wanted to say. I am in the same line of thought. I have been in some paying blogging sites and I always do what I have always done. Just write for the sake of sharing. When I keep thinking on how to make it big or earn more, I lose focus and motivation. Topics we write does not reach all people. It would be great if it did though.
Norma Jean, I’m following you and hope to learn about bots with you. I’m not a writer, I even find difficult to call myself a blogger. I just write randomly, because I like to write (English is not my mother tongue). I’m a photographer that likes to write, sometimes, that’s all. I felt myself identified with you when you say you spent fortunes on the other social networks for nothing. I won’t put a dime on them ever again, that’s for sure. About Steemit, I love it too, and I dream about having more time to dedicate myself and learn more about it. Until there, I’m just concerned about building a good reputation, above all. Cheers and thanks for your comment, have a wonderful weekend!
How can Steemit be an arbiter of good content when votes can be bought or manipulated with Bots?
This isn't sour grapes because my posts don't do well.Perhaps they don't deserve to. But that's the point.How can you seriously tell how good your content is when the judging system is skewed?
My sentiment exactly. Though I am new here, I feel the same way. Who decides to play God anyway? This is so frustrating, it's like "the rich get richer & the poor get poorer" here. I have looked around and have I read some really good stuffs but with very little votes.
There are rumblings of reform coming.It is to be hoped that someone gets a grip before greed destroys it in its infancy
Looking forward to a better steemit. Hopefully I can make it here. Upvoted your response but sadly, my upvote value is 0.00. I feel rather pathetic!
Thank you. No worries.Just keep posting,commenting and being active in the Steemit community and your voting power will grow.
Best wishes.
Of course it is worth to share, and people who want to read it will. You have to see it ( I think) as a book, you have 1000 books 800 walk passed it, 120 will have a look and 80 people may buy it. :-) Then even the ct or 2 ct you make is actually a lot. :-) The bots are just the possibility to get more faster, when the amount of vote is higher, people even talk different to you, and they will all follow. The bots are like a promotional good. It makes the chance that your book gets sold higher :-) Or do I think wrong?
No you are right. The bots are just the latest version of advertisement. Whoever has resources can make a bet to get more attention. This is how businesses also makes money in return. Man and Bot work side by side to create a better world with more quality content. This is a process that constantly is going on that has brought us from Stone Age to High-end Smartphones.
thank you for your answer, happy I understand it right there are so many people against it too, that you feel a criminal when you do :-)
I understand your comparison of voting bots with advertising and promoting. But as I understand from the criticism on here, Bots are used to promote the contributors own content, thus boosting their reward artificially.
Advertising a traditional product or service costs money, which is lost if the buying public vote with their purse.
Thank you. I understand the point you make.Although I'm old I do like to keep up with technology.
I used Bots in betting on Horse Racing. Placing bets on fast moving prices in running, i.e. whilst the race is in progress, for which a Bot is essential.
But for voting I think it is too open to abuse,as seems to be evident from the weight of adverse comments.
I have no knowledge about horse racings :-) I won once because we were tipped. Weird that was! But I do not understand why you see using a bot for betting is different as the bot for votes...
Thank you. I think there maybe a misunderstanding of the role of Robots and their purpose.If a bot is used to advertise a post- to widen it's circulation and have more people see it and vote on the quality of the content,then that is in the spirit of the original intention of Steemit in my view.
But as I understand, bots can be used by a publisher to add votes to their own posts,or by one person opening multiple accounts and programming bots from those accounts to vote where directed.Vote rigging without consideration of content quality.
Betting bots,are used where prices move so fast whilst a race is being run,and is one bettors opinion about a horse's chances,against another person with an opposing view.The bettor sets the price parameters at which the bot will place the bet and close it,either to take profit or to stop loss beyond that programmed.The win or loss is between two individuals.The betting community at large do not lose out.
thank you for the explanation. And I think the knfe cuts both ways with the bot use. you have got a chance to be read more, and to be voted for. Personally, I do read what friends resteem, but I do not read what bots resteem. I do understand what you mean, but then I think you have to do it totally different. Like 1 price for promoting, not who promotes with the highest amount is seen first. That way we can push our message up all the same way, may be on different timings, and the chance of being resteemed naturally and promoted again. Now I sometimes see a high rep person placing something silly and getting like 30 and sometimes much more for it. Just by a few and his own name. May be this would be a nice blog to write ? What when you make Steemit your way? :-)
Self voting would be forbidden. (I do it now! because I can :-) )
Promotion would be for all the same and you could do it daily
resteem only by your followers
to advertise you may only once a day per person! and not per blog.
I think the whole upset should be different to work honestly. The bots are there to get somewhere and maybe even get read more just because you look bigger by getting a bigger reward. Them people who are sweet to you call you sir and mam and please read my blog, you see them so much more often at bigger reputation people OR at posts that has a lot of reward.
Now I am sorry to make this so long, I am a massage therapist and have not any knowledge about setting up all this pc stuff, I just have an idea how it could be better and fairer. But maybe I am totally wrong. :-)Now the smal ones stay small so much longer, because upvotes cost to much sp especially when you have not got a slider ( @busy has!)
Thank you. I think your ideas and thoughts are on the right lines.I read that reforms are on the way, including one person one vote being considered.
It still means you will be able to advertise a post through a voting bot service so that more people see it, which of course is a legitimate tactic.
I think Steemit will be very successful with great potential. The markets seem to be recognising this now with Steem at 2nd spot Bitcoin 13th -
Steem system is skewed, but its much much better than any other system exist out there now.
I truly believe if we get together and do something to make Steem better system then Steem will be even better than right now.
Also note this world is better place but greedy humans making it worst and it seems everywhere you put humans and they find a way to destroyed for their own benefit.
Yes, it is an inspired idea.All the more reason to be concerned that it doesn't get destroyed by the culprit you've identified - Greed
I don’t know if the system or not is skewed. The idea behind it was great but they did underestimate the greed of people.
But the quality of the content is here, it is only more difficult to find!
I agree.The idea is brilliant and has the potential to be a first class asset and influence for good,to reward individuals and the world. I read that reform is coming and one person one vote is being considered?
Although your post is very well written, and I appreciate that, meaning, the well written part, you're still trying to define something that is an abstraction; mind you, I do not begrudge your efforts, in fact, I appreciate them.
But still, and all your points are well taken, trying to define what constitutes good content is almost like a man trying to explain why this starlet with the big boobs, as opposed to that English one with the flawless diction and the green eyes, is 'more beautiful.' I guess what I'm trying to state is that, it's probably something very subjective.
Let me, for example, take a very personal approach to illustrate: I consider myself a pretty fair writer. Yet, and I have only been here for about two weeks, despite several attempts at getting some traction in the form of recognition for 6 or 8 posts, that are, subjectively, of course, very well written by me, all I have gotten is two comments, along with people who seem to "follow" me even before I have clicked the Post button!
Two comments only; of those, one was from some expert on grammar telling me about a minor mistake in one of the posts; the second one was from an individual who does not seem to be in touch with reality, yet he has an account here, plus a keyboard, informing me or, accusing me or the world, that someone had stolen from a non-profit cause that he seem to favor - unfortunately, I know nothing about the cause, and quite fortunately, I know nothing about him or his mental condition!
Thus, as I mentioned above, my own subjective opinion, or perception of, my own shares here blows; no one notices, no one cares, no one recognizes good content; or, if it's atrocious, meaning my own shtick, no one take the time to mention it.
Now, watch, true to my understanding of how things work here on
steemit, this whole post is now about to go to sleep into a deep black void of silence; let's don't forget apathy, as well.
Anyway, thanks for your share!
Thanks for the post 👍
The problem lately and mostly for Newbies, is that nobody gives attention to their posts. Whether they are low quality or high quality content. Whether they spend two hours writing a post or just few minutes. Without voting bots, it is difficult to be visible and now everyone of us know that the most posts on the trending page are upvoted by bots.
Exactly! One post I created for playing chess and spent a few hours making it really nice and informative. Guess how many votes I got zero. Nothing to pop your bubble of confidence like that effort for zero payout.
Yes I know that feeling. Some months ago everything was a bit better than it is now :(
Life is competition. You need to create content daily. You also need to come up with interesting ways to capture peoples attention. The best strategies are usually fast and plenty or little but massive in quality so it stands out immediately. I talk about thousands of hours or practice to become really talented at a craft. This is the sacrifice that it takes.
Unfortunately, This is not the case for steemit. The main feeds get popular and attention. I have seen pro photographers who are really good at what they do. You know how much their earnings are? About $1 per post. This is not right.
This is not right? Sounds like entitlement. The market will reward what people want. People want a specific kind of content. This means the artist has to not only consider what he likes to do but also what the market wants.
It's about building up an audience and create a cool personal brand that people like and then you can start to sell something and do something cool. This is an art-form. Talent is overrated it's about how hard you work these days.
I think Discovery and Audience Building are two of the biggest problems facing new Steemians.
Until then, they struggle against the other half of Steemit which is bidbot heavy.
Absolutely! And I have noticed lately that many people left the platform while others arent active anymore. That means voting bots are doing all the job, while very rare people read the content
You need to build relationships with other humans. If you care about other humans and is very interested in their life then I can promise you that they will return the favor. Since that is how we are wired. It doesn't cost you anything to build connections and real trust with other humans. But it will take Time and Attention from your side.
hello steem friend My sentiment exactly. Though I am new here, I feel the same way. Who decides to play God anyway? This is so frustrating, it's like "the rich get richer & the poor get poorer" here. I have looked around and have I read some really good stuffs but with very little votes
Well this is of the most difficult questions to answer.
Some posts may be rubbish for one person, but a gold mine for another!
I do think that using images, text formatting, chapters and so on will be regardless of the content of the article a big plus for the post.
But according to me the quality should be searched within the content. I do admit that not all my posts are quality post, while I do normally use formatting and images!
I do write about three niches namely Steem related, Crypto related and sports (betting) related. So my group of followers is a quite deverse group!
If I do write about Steem, regardless of the quality, I will have a bigger chance that it will interest people!
If I do write about crypto related stuff, probably some followers who are interested in the sports part will skip the post!
Nice article. I hope sometime I will at least 1/10 same cool as you.
hi there!!!
great post!!!! thanks a lot for sharing your experience with all of us.
good luck!!!!!
have a great day!!!
You just planted 0.56 tree(s)!
We have planted already 5251.68 trees
out of 1,000,000
Let's save and restore Abongphen Highland Forest
in Cameroonian village Kedjom-Keku!
My Steem Power = 25232.36
Thanks a lot!
Thanks to @hyperfundit.supp Plant trees with @treeplanter and get paid for it! @martin.mikes coordinator of @kedjom-keku
Your post was mentioned in the Steemit Hit Parade in the following category:Congratulations @hyperfundit!
Very informative. I'm reminded of the things to consider in writing quality content especially in this platform. This article is useful not only in digital format but even in pen and paper write ups. Cheers for more helpful articles like this. God speed.
I think every one have its own definition but what the most guideline for the quality content are there .
Thanks for your hard working am going to the Technics but I have an question , can you use other peoples work and cite them and how your going to put link of your source to the platform
I think this post is really helpful and a lot of new people can get to know so much about what to post and how to post. The definition of quality content has been highlighted very appropriately. I think posts like these should be given more and more importance and henceforth, I'm resteeming this post.
Hope that ik helping more and more people know and understand what quality content is all about.
Thanks for sharing this beautiful post. :)
I found pain and suffering a good way to get your writing life in order. Because all great art is based on suffering the artists had to go through.
For example: I wrote a horror book based on my experience in Miami. It was great detox for me. Sadly, it may not be for the reader.
Good post
vis
Source
Generic comments could be mistaken for spam.
More information:
The Art of Commenting
Comment Classifications
Thank fotlr you
Visit my blog 🙏
Informative post of the day.
Such an incredible post full of informations! Thanks a lot for your work here :)
To write a quality content is not an easy job
Nothing wastes a writer’s time more than sitting down to write and not knowing what you want to say. If a deadline is looming, you’re just stuck in that chair until inspiration strikes. This is a major time-waster. That pressure to deliver a great post idea — right now — also inhibits creativity for many writers.
Quality content really deserves some accolades
Now this is what I call leading by example.it is amazing that you have covered all the points you are explaining in your article. It might sound hard to us at the moment, but it is something you can practice and master in a week. Love the sample way you drive your points home.
Thanks..^^;
I agree with this. ALSO, I believe that the title of one's content goes a long way in determining whether or not the interest of the targeted readers are caught; for example: I wouldn't bother reading this post if the title was uninteresting to me. Finally, I have the opinion that basic knowledge of SEO should come in quite handy for someone writing for the internet.
Yo pienso que la autenticidad y la genealidad así como, la personalidad debe transmitirse en un escrito de calidad. Gracias
Hooray..... I was looking for this funda... I am here in this great platform viz namely Steemit for relatively for a longer time and made many posts and comments but still I am not sure where those stands in terms of quality...
And I think now that knowingly or not I was following few of these suggestions...
Thanks a lot for this and highly appreciate if possible and if you have time please have a look at one of my recent post (given below)and give me a honest assessment..
https://steemit.com/haiku/@angelro/a-haiku-for-my-lovely-friends
Thanks in advance...
Really interesting @ntowl! But, aren't you basically explaining just how SEO works when you're saying "the best content is what Google considers best and this are the ways to make Google say that". Could you tell us what do you consider "good content" from a personal perspective?
Si definitivamente cada persona tiene gustos y necesidades diferentes. lo que quizás es interesante para mi no es interesante para otro y viceversa, y es precisamente de allí la diversidad de contenido y Steemit es un ejemplo de ello PARA TODOS LOS GUSTOS pero con grandes contenidos. Por eso comparto tu opinión
@fullcoverbetting el contenido es lo mas importante. Gracias por tu post muy bueno
Glad that I did have some evenings lesson Spanish, I do think that I can understand the most of your comment :)
We are on the same page :)Your welcome @luisanaport
the problem is I'm not good at writing nor to define something any tips to improve my quality writing?
Wow....@hyperfundit!! You just told me everything I needed to know about posting here on steemit. I think I've made some mistakes pertaining to this here, but I would follow your advise, just to make it better. Thanks a lot.
As an imaginative thinker, the inspiration comes to me at the odd times. To me they are very beautiful thing, which can be a very good content but the courage to believe that this is coming from my own personal thoughts isn't just there. I write, and then tear it off. I wish I had the self-esteem to believe I could be and give the best. Somehow, am working on myself.
Pls I need steemit friends. Kindly follow while i follow back.
A very informative post! Very helpful for steemit begineers like me.
A very informative post! Very helpful for steemit begineers like me.
A very informative post! Very helpful for steemit begineers like me.
Wowow - you'll get three times the likes from all three of these comments!!
I've always had the trouble that some of my content is often 'too long'. It's weird.
Its to the point that I've taken long content and cut it up into more 'steem-sized' portions that seem to do a bit better on the platform.
Its a little disconcerting that many Steemers do not like to engage with longer-form content compared to quick skims or memes.
Thanks for sharing your advice.
Do you not think that "Quality Content" Is a coined phrase (No pun intended)
Also from inception to realization. Content takes life and time to create.
At which point that content. Can soon disappear from sight, on such a narrow band of option within the steemit home page, Don't you think?
You say that google, is the resource for the definition/example, to afford quality content?
But are we not on steemit? Where does Googles jurisdiction, end? Surely like Social media sites.
Steemit content is by far, hidden from Googles heavy eye and gaze?
MAKE CONTENT LONG ENOUGH?
Would it not be better. To create an article compelling. Whether, bite size or otherwise. That article will entice, while offering many bite sized chucks to your new found audience?
Ps great article, I voted up and would love to hear your thoughts
I found this an interesting blog as am still wanting to be a blogger........ STEEMIT is an inspiration for me and not had many check my b,logs at all......... I must be bad, but am going to keep at it till I get it right.......... thanks
"make it long enough" 80% of the people read no more than headlines,or titles.That's a fact.Therefore a long article must be super entertaining or informative and just a very few writers have the skills to come up with posts like that daily.And that's a problem on Steemit,because for the majority it means they will never make money on the platform and leave.We need to change that if we want @steemit to succeed in a long run.
Great post for writing Quality Content.The main problem is to write quality content this article is very helpful to write quality content.Thanks
Hi. Thanks for the details above. I must agree it is one of the most simple and informative article I have read in a while. Many of the things we usually know but tend to forget and do not apply it while writing. It looks so easy to sue as a checklist for each article we may write.
Thumbs Up!
Thank you @hyperfundit for your informative post and even more interesting discussion in the comments. :) Being new to Steemit, there is much I still need to learn and appreciate the insights and experiences shared in the comments along with the post itself.