I would want To have fame. Money could buy fame but not for everyone and Not much. We know the world's richest man, but how many of us know about the world's top 10 richest man except the first, where they live, what they do, why are they so much successful.
Anyone will know about world's top 100 famous person. Apart from earning a lot of money, they have made their legacy, which they would leave for centuries. We still know albert einstein, newton, edison, shakespeare. But can anyone tell who was the richest at that time.
Also I have written an article about being suddenly rich, so taking it into consideration, I will opt Being famous.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Agreed, but why would you prefer to be famous?
Still need the words to explain?
Yes. At least from the perspective of someone who would rather enjoy life while it lasts than be remembered.
Though actors make for a bad example, as their levels of fame and wealth are usually equivalent.
I understood it as more of an "either or" question.
I would not say Anyone who would want to enjoy their life, would be remembered.
We have to give up all our enjoyments, so we could work day and night so that what we achieve as a result of our hardwork will be appreciated by the whole world.
I'm still not hearing why it is so important to be remembered.
I prefer to be happy while I can, rather than have statues of me litter the landscape under which I rest.
Everyone's perception is different, Happiness is a state of mind. Some are happy with money, some are with their loved ones, some are happy when they are alone. You can't generalise everyone on your choice of Life. You want to be happy in your life, how can you be happy? By doing what you like. Those who want to be remembered, are doing througout their life what makes them happy.
I wasn't projecting, just curious about the motivation behind the goal because I only ever heard about the goal itself. And if all that makes you happy, great! I hope you achieve your goals. It's just that you were talking about a life of hardship, not happiness.
Nope, most people LIVE IN THE MOMENT, not many give a single fuck about what happens after their death, including the political "revolutionaries" .
Heath ledger really enjoyed his work, he hasn't "given up" his pleasures and just doing his thing. Now if people want to glorify him then that's an added bonus, but the man himself probably didn't set out looking for that.
.
People like Einstein or Tesla didn't give up their pleasures to do science all day for years , it was something they really loved doing. Public recognition is the byproduct.
Living to be "remembered" is no living at all. I'd suggest not taking inspiration from Hollywood celebs, sports stars and even other "successful" people like Zuckerberg, Musk or Hawking. They are usually superficial and shallow in public, and sometimes even act as mouthpieces for MSM
Well, If you compare them to a normal person, The enjoyment for a normal preson is to watch T.V, Surf social media, Waste time in non productive activities.
But for those, They have made their work their life and their enjoyment.
Now who is really enjoying his life and who is just wasting time. That's why I said to give up all our enjoyments to achieve anything.
OK nice to read about your perspective on this. I see where you are coming from and I agree.
That's great.
Hmm...putting myself into the shoes of famous people, I have to say "no thanks".
To be "uber" famous is to have attention constantly on you; to have little to no privacy, or, alternatively, to be forced into a sheltered (hermit) lifestyle; to have every single action and word scrutinized by the public; to have a big following of supporters, sure, but also a huge group of haters (it's not uncommon for pro athletes and movie stars to get daily hate-mail and even death threats). To be famous is more of a curse than a blessing, IMO.
I'm after peace (peace of mind), so I'd rather be left alone than a target to millions (billions?) of eyes. Give me a huge lot of land with little or no human activity and a lot of nature and bird-song and I'll live blissfully, thank you very much :)
well, both fame and money we have to earn and they don't come easy. we have to put a lot of efforts to achieve even a little bit.
That may be true, but we have a choice what we do with our money (energy) and we may not have much, or any, choice over what other people do (to us; how we're treated) because of our fame.
That sound lame, if we are famous, It doesn't mean that we will be targeted specifically. Yes all our words, actions and whatever we do would be scrutinised by people we don't know, but that would be part of a life.
And where there is money involved, there is lot more politics than fame.
Those mafia guys, and underworld would be more interested in money, not in clicking a picture with you.
I personally don't understand people's draw to fame, maybe it's a result of our differences of personality. For me, personally, I don't need or want attention; in fact, I prefer to be away from it and to have my own, private, friendships and "business partners", if/when I ever feel the need to have that type of relationship.
I'd rather work behind the scenes, without all the distractions and potential threats of being a well known person. Less distractions and more "free time", IMO, leads to more production and more personal time to spend with family and friends.
Lame, to me, is desiring to have people care (or, at least, know) about you. I don't give two shits what people think about me, or whether I'm relevant to them, and it feels great to be this way.
Well, whatever kind of life suits us, we lead that, I can't prove you wrong, maybe you are right for your own, at the end what matters is if we are able to live our life how we wanted or not.
So long as that lifestyle doesn't impose unnecessary suffering on other people, we're in agreement :)