SHOCK: 97% Climate Change Consensus DEBUNKED
A shocking new report debunks the "97% consensus" on climate change, pointing out that, in fact, 99.94% of peer-reviewed climate science studies support the view that human activity on earth is impacting the climate, including changing air and ocean temperatures
Are you surprised by the new higher number?
▶️ DTube
▶️ IPFS
Not surprised (as a PhD in a related field) and I'm relieved this is where the article went with that title.
haha, good to hear!
climite change a shoking new everyboy. sir @davidpakman thanks for sharing this post with us.i am your fan.keep up sharing.go on.
Am I the only one having problems with DTube?
No, I was having problems today but also in the past.
I really wanna watch the videos but DTube is giving problems.
Hmmmm
I don't think there is much dispute whether humans cause climate change. The disputes are on HOW MUCH and whether the change caused will be an issue in the future.
There's not a big dispute there either if you read the scientific literature.
And what's the margin of error? 0.06%?
More evidence and more studies since the 97% figure came out, so not a surprise.
You should run more climate change segments, David. And not this stuff, but actual science news.
ah, ok gotcha
haha, if you say so...
hi again dave & friend. interesting what you had to say about levels of info incongruity... i'm taking mental notes and can always use a new more helpful conceptual framework. in regards to what your guest/cohost has to say um jeremy rifkin when speaking of the need for us to become a more globally empathic people points to tribalism (blood ties), religion (religous ties) & nationalism (ideology) as myths that have had a unifying power for humanity. this i think is what needs to be mentioned when the young lady in the video here points up the parallel between all too human approach to religion & politics... its likely there this almost complete overlap in the sense that they are same because they are both grand myths
and yes i do firmly believe that spewing fossil fuel pollutants and other chemicals into the atmosphere at ever growing rates for the last 200ish yrs has in resulted to some degree in the weather anomalies and ecological crisis we see today. also if it does at all play a role in the present ecological collapse then change in human patterns of behavior in regards to energy is the one thing we do have control over
Ask the most fervent climate change denier if they'd prefer breathing in diesel particulates and other carcinogenic compounds directly into their lungs and bloodstreams, or if they'd prefer energy production that uses cleaner, more sustainable methods that don't spew toxic substances into the air that their children breathe. Whether or not climate change is actually real or not is actually irrelevant when put in the context of what actually affects them and their families on a day to day basis. Couple that with the fact that the footprint of renewable sources of energy such as wind and solar are much more gentle on the local environment, and can be re-purposed within months rather than years, decades or even millennia, as is the case with other forms of energy production. Even if climate change turns out to be false, everyone wins, if it turns out to be true, everyone wins. It's a no-brainer.
Cheeky (the title I mean). As a long-time YouTube watcher new to Steemit, surprised and delighted to find you on here. Keep up the great work: shrewd, rational media voices are to be prized more than ever at the moment.