That reversion is what I'm pinning my hopes on if things go poorly, but no witness seems willing to acknowledge that we could go back.
Posted using Partiko Android
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
That reversion is what I'm pinning my hopes on if things go poorly, but no witness seems willing to acknowledge that we could go back.
Posted using Partiko Android
Count me in as the first, there has been some internal witness discussion that we can always change what doesn't work, we are always open to iterating.
Well good. Every witness seems nervous about the curve. Why, if it's the nerve-wracking part, must it be included?
Posted using Partiko Android
I think only a handful are nervous about it, a majority really want the curve. But in the end everyone is reasonable, if it doesn't work I'm sure it will be tweaked for the next HF.
Everything is a matter of balancing tradeoffs. Risks and costs versus benefits. Many are nervous about the curve because it has potential costs and risks but also benefits. On balance, the potential benefits carried the argument for now. That can be revisited or adjusted later with experience.