You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: @timcliff's Witness Hardfork Approval Standards v0.1

in #witness-category6 years ago

It's well thought out. To a large extent, we already are doing something basically along those lines. IMO it is a little bit too formal though. Getting a lot of the parties mentioned in the post to do things a certain way is a little bit like herding cats.

Sort:  

Thank you for reading it. Is what you're already doing happening on Slack? Because what I see on Steemit is more so people pushing for their own point of view rather than looking at metrics and designing an experiment to determine how well their idea would work.

Yeah, it can be as formal as needed. Getting a lot of the parties to participate in a given process can happen if they see benefit from using the process. They have to have confidence that it's a process we're all agreeing to use, and we're all agreeing to adjust it to suit our collective needs, and we'll use data to determine what works how well, rather than the one with the most power/influence making the decision. If people have confidence that this is indeed the case, they will participate if they are asked to and it is shown to them very clearly how to participate.