Nice post @lukestokes and great topic to spin further on.
I find it interesting that there are many users with more than 100k VESTS that have voted (134,133 MV (35.4%)) than users with at least one post (100,395 MV (33%)).
Shows we have a few investors only that hasn't posted anything.
We also have a very few ones (134,302 MV (35%)) that hasn't posted or invested much, but that are still voting.
Going to follow your upcoming posts on the topic.
To be clear, the two filters I'm using are not combined or additive. Meaning, I'm just filtering for MV > 100,000 in one case and just filtering for posts >=1 in the other. I don't have a filter for posts and MV together, though that might be interesting to look at.
Sorry, I may have been unclear on my part :)
What I ment was that the first part where you filter for everyone MV > 100k we have a higher MV than when you filter for more than 1 post. Meaning we have many users with a high MV power that hasn't posted anything.
If a user has > 100k MV and hasn't posted they will not be visible in your second statement.
Or maybe I'm just thinking wrong here...
That's what I meant about the filters not being added together. The second statement is just about those who haven't posted. It doesn't also take into account their MV amount. That means an account can be in both groups.