You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Plans for Basic Income with Verification on Steem

At the phase 1, this project is only based on Korea...

Each verified user is upvoted weekly with the same weight if they post

For upvote, I will delegate 250,000~400,000 SP and now contacting Korean big stakeholders to participate.

I’m not sure what the purpose would be, since you also believe this:

An ideal solution is fixing all in decentralized ways but it has been failing since the beginning of Steem, such as whale's reward domination, collusive reward voting, vote bidding, etc.

Aren’t the results the same? This would involve whale influence and voting for a specific group of users for no other reason than the fact that they posted something.

The shared reward pool would still experience “reward leaks.” It just wouldn’t necessarily be to completely anonymous users, which is practically irrelevant regarding the actual effect.

Proof-of-Brain is the core value of Steem.

I understand your intent here but I don’t see how your plan/project actually improves this “core value.” Am I missing something? I only see proof-of-identity. The brain part is quite subjective...and not even necessary once identity is verified.

Once a user is verified, they can simply create a bot to post daily and receive their votes. Then we’re right back in the same position as far as quality, bots, and reward “leaking” is concerned.

Sort:  

Ich bin ein Koreaner.

Basic income farming using bots will be restricted (i.e., no more basic income) based on other human user's monitoring. The core value of this project is brining more real people into Steem who can create value units.

| The brain part is quite subjective.

It is. However, Identifying "human brain" from "algorithm" is objective, until AI's contents creation and conversation skills are developed to human-level.