Sort:  

Yes it is for sure!!!
Better then Ecency for that part

Yes, I agree. I've always far preferred PeakD's Hive-Engine interface to Ecency's. I've noticed that different Hive-Engine interfaces handle layer-2 delegations in rather different ways. The way that Ecency and BeeSwap do it is very confusing to me, which has caused me to mess up a few of my delegations. The way that PeakD, and Hive Engine do it is far more logical to me, and as such flows with how I do things much more. 😁 🙏 💚 ✨ 🤙

Still a bit in dubio over which one I then prefer, PeakD or BeeSwap to be honest. And of course, it also depends on what exactly you're trying to do on the Hive-Engine...
!ALIVE

I use different frontends for specific purposes, ones that have been implemented (in my opinion) well. I don't do everything from only one, as the needed functionality is not there yet. 😁 🙏 💚 ✨ 🤙

!ALIVE

Indeed, which is a bit of a pity on one hand (not one tool with all functionality), but a good thing on the other hand, as it doesn’t bind you to one specific Frontend. But then again, it also makes the search harder to find the things that you need, even if you don’t even know yet that you would need them…

On the one hand it would be great if I could quickly, easily, efficiently, and effectively do everything that I need via one frontend, but I actually like being spread out across several, as it helps me understand Hive better, plus I also always have my beloved backups! 😁 🙏 💚 ✨ 🤙

Yes indeed! I am struggling with the same duality there! Ideally it would be a good generic Frontend for most of the everyday stuff, and then good decent in-depth powertools for the more advanced stuff!
And backups! Very important for sure!!!