I think you are in for a crash course on how to think:

Perhaps try playing devils advocate on this topic & see for yourself how much faith based belief others have on this subject.

I needn't play anything but then what do you call it when I've asked for evidence of all these theoretical models that make much more sense to you? Would that be an "assertion" about you? maybe even an "insult" when pressed to answer questions that are brought up by what you talk about?

& everything does not scale in the magical world of gravity. Can my
car be 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000kilos
while traveling 10000000mph ?

How about that, the hypocrisy: you want me to play devil's advocate yet you're the first to swipe with "Magic" which before this you attempted to marginalize common sense as "programming", so sense, or sensibility is out the window because you "seem" to "believe" or whatever other word you want to use to mean exactly one thing but which you're probably going to deny and want to point out that you left yourself an out with "it seems to me", but you didn't, you meant one thing only and one thing only: that what I consider sense you consider "programing". Yet when you swipe like this you also think you can still ask me Why not be "devil's" advocate, which is a FUTILE game that NOBODY wants to play but look I've not only played but I've asked you numerous times about the Coriolis Effect and you've not even entertained it but outright ignored it how many times? and that's despite the fact that it pertained ENTIRELY to your "question" which seems so far to imply you've hardly taken the time to discover the answer yourself, out of your exhaustive research for SPIN and CURVE (curve, to which initially when pressed that this can be verified from any cheapo scope with filters, as both the sun from its 28 day revolution and the moon from its shadows and libration