Even if Assad chemically attacked his own people, why is this any different than when Obama and Bush "Love Bombed" weddings full of innocents in the Middle East to take out one target and free the rest of the attendants from terrorist leaders and "Evil Dictators" forever and eternally? Why is this any different than when Bush bombed Baghdad, an entire city full of innocents, into oblivion during the invasion of Iraq. How is this any different than the mass of innocents killed by Obama during the drone strikes of his Presidency. All of which we have some shred of evidence, and more, to prove they actually happened. Perhaps it's better in the minds of the Elite and MSM to blow the victims legs and arms off, having them die slowly and painfully on the ground as appossed to chemically attacking them so they die on the ground slowly and painfully. In my mind though, brutality is brutality no matter who the deliverers it, and hypocrisy is hypocrisy no matter who is perpetrating it. No one is "more" dead from a chemical attack, anymore than they are "less" dead from a drone strike. Innocent People dead, is innocent people dead no matter how you spin it. Perhaps, we should decide whether we're going to stop bombing innocent people and decide the punishments for those of us (you know who I'm talking about) who have bombed innocents for well over a decade, before we decide to invade the last secular nation of the Middle East for allegedly bombing their own innocents. Whether we have proof of it or not.