That sounds like a stupid term. If you are a sovereign you are that, and if you are a citizen you are that, you can not be both. I always considered myself an American. Its funny how assertion of rights that were fought for are considered a wacky term sovereign citizen. Which means nothing but is defined by the opposition.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Sovereign citizen is someone who is born in our society but believes the society's rules do not apply to them because they have not accepted the rules. Therefore no one has jurisdiction to present judgement onto them unless they have given that person the right to. It is a weird way of thinking about it, but it is a thing, and this kinda of reminded me of that.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement
Sorry that's not me. My argument is that if I am acting outside of their regulatory purview which we the people delegated to them than their is no infraction. Example: If you are on a fishing boat and wild life officer tells you to give him your ID and you gave him a fishing license he would assume you are fishing and therefore subject to his jurisdiction. However if you gave him an ID card he would have to prove you were fishing. The production of a license could and would have binding obligation on you. So laws absolutely apply if you are acting in the capacity in which cops have jurisdiction. I know as Americans we have been taught that they have control over everything but that is not the case. Most if not all laws target a specific activity.
Thanks for sharing your opinion! I guess the sovereign citizen tag doesn't apply here. Keep sharing!