You get downvoted because you monetize content you didn't create.
I know you do create content, and I am glad you mentioned hive in this video, but in order to be fair across the board we can't downvote other plagiarism and not your's, too.
If you took the time to be a voice in the consensus, rather than just drop posts expecting to get paid, then maybe you can influence the choices made by those people that keep the platform as spam/plagiarism free as we can.
I doubt it is about plagarism but rather politics. I have been noticing huge downvotes to WAM and Max Igan recently on their original work. They are considered 'Alt-Right' and 'Conspiracy Theoriests'. As a rape victim of illegal immigrants, I don't and can't watch politically correct TV. For me, that shit is too traumatic. Like so many other victims of politically correct crimes, we don't watch the BS. However, MSM has now classed anyone who watches these alt-media channels with alternative political views as 'Far-right'. Certain types of rape victims are 'far-right Nazis'.
Now thay are mass downvoting on Hive, channels often called 'Alt-right' by MSM. Personally, I believe they are trying to purify the platform of any alternative politics. I hope these guys stand their ground and continue uploading to web3.0. If they don't, and the internet becomes as obsolete as tptb are promising, then there will be no alternative view on web3.0. Only the 'correct' politics will exist. This is a concern to the likes of myself because I have a huge amount of information I want to put up on web3.0. This is simply because the internet heavily shadow-banned me, where it did not outright ban me under my previous name Social3state (seems we have the same idea with out names, eh?).
At least if they continue to post on to web3.0, I will be able to see if the intention is to ban these voices, or financially punish us. If it is the latter, I can deal with that easy. If it is banning us, that is a long process. I watch with interest.
I am just worried that Hive will go the same way as Steemit because of a few big whales. We are making adjustments to the site to address this tough.
Humbly, I want to express My condolences for Your trauma (I watched a friend murdered on a satanic altar as well as having satanic ritual abuse and just sexual abuse, so I grasp), and offer You something that helped Me.
I can't find a PDF of Choice Theory by William Glasser, but I found this which helps grasp what is put forth in that book (and I'm sure You can buy a copy if interested):
https://wglasser.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Little-Book-of-Choice-Theory-2019.pdf
I am sorry you saw something so traumatic happen to a loved one and went through such abuse. Thank you for the information. It is greatly appreciated.
So glad to help!
Then you are wrong.
Join the conversations.
https://discord.gg/tVjRSwTG9v
Some of that does occur, and when it does there are initiatives that try to correct it.
https://discord.gg/TXPkMRXYuG
The more voices in the conversations the better the crowd sourcing.
I have spoke up defending Max, he is just trying to get by, imo.
The others often don't respond to their comments, they drop posts expecting to get paid without servicing their audience, this is why many of them get flagged.
We want participants, not farmers dropping content they monetize elsewhere dropping it here, too.
To be transparent, I have stated that you should get flagged for the same reasons as berwick and beetoons, monetizing content you didn't create.
Were you to set rewards to burn/decline then I would be against flagging you, but as long as you monetize content not of your own creation you violate the intent of the rewards pool to incentivize original content, imo.
Nothing personal about it, I suffered the same flags over a year ago.
I think what you do brings value to the chain, but the community standard is original content every time.
Monetizing the content of others is plagiarism.
If we allow it then it is all we will have and the platform gets abandoned by folks that value real work over stolen work.
No. Plagiarism is claiming to have authored what someone else did. Monetizing content someone else created is publishing. I don't fault you for desiring original content, at all. However, I disagree that if you allow folks to monetize content they didn't create that is all there will be. In fact I reckon that's insuperable hyperbole.
Content on Hive draws eyeballs, and it doesn't matter one whit if the monetizer created it themselves or not in that regard. Monetizers that only post the content of others run the risk of simply being replaced, because anyone can do that, most particularly the creators of the content. That is what we are doing to TV and other legacy publishing platforms, posting our own content instead of such monetizers doing the publishing. Your definition of plagiarism would cast all legacy publishers as plagiarists, which is clearly not the case.
Where it gets absurd is when the content monetized is from creators that have been flagged off Hive.
By being particularly rigorous you avoid misunderstanding that grows in consequence the further you stray from base principle, such as when you can claim you are defending authors of content from plagiarists when flagging monetizers of content whose authors don't post on Hive because you have flagged them until they gave up.
That's just silly.
Regarding authors that post the same content elsewhere and here, and don't engage with their audience here, flagging that content here forces it's audience to go elsewhere to get it. Their audience will ascertain how valuable their engagement is and act accordingly in a market in which some authors do engage substantively. Seems to me you are trying to micromanage the entire community's interests, which is proverbially herding cats, and intolerable tyranny in the Soviet style.
In both these ways negative curation actually suppresses content that has a market on Hive, and suppresses the market for Hive. I'm pretty sure that flying flags on anything but spam, scams, plagiarism - the real definition of plagiarism - and legally actionable criminal speech, suppresses the market for Hive, and not flagging those things does too.
Your cabal is critically important to Hive and requires precision in it's targeting relative to it's import, which accuracy seems to yet be developing. bractice makes berfect. Please, get better.
Look in @freebornsociety's activities filtered for downvotes and show me the abusive flags.
If it was a problem at one time, it is not as much a problem now.
Imo, not enough people have the facts of what is occurring today as opposed to what occurred prior to the fork to hive.
Follow the flaggots and offer your feedback on what they do.
Absent this input, we get what we got.
I did it, and I changed my opinion on what was actually occurring with the flaggots.
Fyi, flaggot is an @skeptic coined term, I adopted it as a way to mitigate taboos around flagging.
Nobody complains about the upvotes.
This is why we need trolls. @skeptic was one of the worst writers I have ever corresponded with, yet I find the term he coined as expressive as any I've ever used.
I fear my writing has conveyed meaning I didn't intend. The word 'you' can do that, when used generally and read by someone that interprets it as 'you, personally'. I have not looked at anyone's history and did not mean to accuse you personally of anything except insofar as you are actually downvoting. There are times when I find I am upvoting posts you have downvoted. I am not compiling a list of your sins, and only have here sought to benefit from your exposition of your actions when you defend yourself from my accusation of flagging for political reasons, as I did see that happening.
I am glad I did, because your eloquent exposition of your purpose and that of the Watchers has significantly changed my understanding, which formerly was quite baffled that you were party to it. We may yet disagree on points, as is proper. I am greatly encouraged to consider your comments here, and to see the fruits of your work in the posts available from accounts that had ceased to post, or continued to struggle against efforts to destroy them that is now ended or reduced.
I am somewhat shamed to not participate myself, but I do work daily with my hammer and saw, and am incapable of a meaningful commitment to participation yet. Neither am I convinced my participation would be all that welcome, lol. Since I depend on my time working to sustain myself on goodwill, I would be loathe to need to depend on Hive, as would be necessary at some point. I probably need to spend some Hive so I can quit bragging I never do. No one needs such humbling more than I, IMHO.
Ackshually, @r0nd0n has, or at least has acted to counter them by flagging himself. Again, this is why I am confident we need trolls. Unreasonable opinions shake us out of our familiar context and make us reconsider everything from the ground up, which is more valuable than I can relate.
Despite my refusal to commit to your recommended course, I have had extensive discussion regarding some flags, and did see one account blacklisting reversed, which greatly increased my respect for the blacklister, far more than it did the blacklisted.
Ron is the don, for sure.
One of the most well reasoned people I've known.
I wouldn't worry too much about offending me, only I can do that.
I often misinterpret what people say because what they think they said is not always what I heard them to say.
It comes across as talking past them, sometimes.
Other times it is a conversational tactic to try to get them to think.
To examine their beliefs as they may be wrong.
As unexamined beliefs can be.
Conversations such as you offer put a toll on me, I have to think deeply, and that is very much like work.
Good for me, makes me richer, but wears me out when I get too much.
You'll notice I had to take a nap.
If you could give the hive more time it will only serve to make it better, imo.
At some point the networking effect has to kick and that we haven't sold will enrich us monetarily as much as it has intellectually.
At least, that is the hopium I keep huffing.
I have intended to be here as long as we last, both me and Hive. Recently I have observed an Android phone send a text the owner of the phone did not type and send, and that has chilled me more than I can describe. My confidence in my ability to remain online is now in question.
Still, Hive, as long as I can speak freely and read others forthright speech, will be the last place I leave, if I do. I no longer use a phone at all, as I cannot get a landline here that doesn't require a digital interface, which allows the spoofing I observed. I cannot permit Goolag to send words ascribed to me that I did not speak, and I don't have a phone otherwise.
I will seek to resolve that problem, but if Goolag is spoofing texts, it's an extremely intransigent problem. I am unsure of what that means for the internet using linux computers and VPN exclusively, which is how I go online.
Sorry I am excessively verbose. I do undertake to say precisely what I mean, and despite that sometimes miscommunicate, but always use more words than seems necessary.
The only thing people can purge here is your rewards.
If it's a voice you are looking for, your texts will be stored on the chain, in theory, forever. If a frontend chooses to display your content with a soft censor, there exist people who are tech-capable to create a frontend that's more suited for consumption (hopefully).
See? It's totally not censorship when we flag content for political disagreement, because it's theoretically possible that someone might be able to find a way to read them, someday.
You're a shill for a cabal of whales suppressing political views you disagree with, no different from the WEF using CNN and the enemedia for the same purpose. You attack people financially, just like Canada attacked people donating to the protests by seizing their bank accounts.
You're why Hive can't moon. You're why Hive can't be a voluntarist government that people can use to create movements to successfully oppose legacy tyrannies. You and your ilk prevent economic power from inuring to individuals and groups countering the WEF agenda on Hive.
You're a censor for the extant technocracy. It's what you do.
Bullshit. It's already possible. But people like you prefer to bitch and moan.
Nothing has changed with your exaggerated self-righteousness.
LOL Did you flag me for excessive rewards? Because I plagiarized, or was scamming?
Thanks for proving you flag because of disagreements of opinion.
Thanks for proving me right.
I flagged you for being an asshole and a liar.
That's how downvote is used in real life. You aren't right and you will never be right.
!lolz
I'm always right, because I listen carefully to criticism and change my mind when I'm wrong, which is how I become right. Maybe you could use that to your advantage, instead of just throwing flags and insults with your alts. Thanks for that list, BTW.
I also appreciate your forthright statement of the purpose of your flags, which is pretty obvious from who you flag and what they are saying. It's good to know all the claims about disagreement with rewards, spam, and scamming are just bullshit, and you just flag people whose opinions you don't like.
If you thought you were right and could provide sound arguments to prove it, you would. Your insults and flags prove better than anything I could ever say that you know better, and insults and flags are the only arguments you have.
Thanks for proving that.
Lurk in the discords if you want to participate more in what we do.
I appreciate your kind suggestion.
Yes, it is the information I want stored. What about videos? Would they exist forever? Or can they be removed? My intention is to get as much truth on web3.0 as is possible. If I get rewards, great, that helps.
My mission however, is not to earn but rather inform.
Speaking of such, I hope you don't mind if I leave this link to an article about my self-represented rape case here. https://hive.blog/hive-140662/@livingthetruth11/how-i-won-my-own-self-representing-rape-case-marxist-extremism-and-setting-precedent-part-3
The chain itself does not store videos. You'll need some other decentralized solutions for videos (IPFS, Filecoin, etc.).
Filecoin? Does that actually work? I put a node online a few years back, opened up an HD partition and nothing.
Thank you.
3speak is making an ipfs frontend for videos, until then videos/pics are hosted on a server that could be ordered to stop.
Only text is immutable, at this point.
Yeah I understand @enforcer48 and that makes sense.
I'm sorry to hear about your hardship, and encourage you to be the best person you can, and out your model life.
P.S. Why did you stop using @social3state?
Thank you. I have been fighting back and successfully. I will continue to do so. I will be using Hive as my chosen platform. The name social3state also became shadow-banned on reddit and other social sites I had not used before. If I wrote a comment, I would return to it later and it was removed or I simply couldn't upload it. Victims like myself have been told to shut up for the sake of diversity by our politicians in the UK. Victims of anything that goes against the politics are heavily censored. Not just illegal immigration these days.
There seems to be trouble with that username on most platforms though unfortunately. Or more likely, what it represents, a victim of political correctness. A victim of the harmful virtue. To use those platforms now I need a different username.
Ah okay, understood . . btw, one of the best ways to combat non-virtue is #Virtue
Posted via Blog | D.Buzz
We are implementing so we can "decline payout" for creators that are not yet linking back to vigilante.tv and on the creators videos we maintain their original descriptions with links to all their things.
Every word you used in your comment was not created by you, and could theoretically be claimed to be plagiarism according to the flimsy argument you make here. Berwick's content is not plagiarism. It's not flagged because of plagiarism, nor because it's spam, or a scam. It's flagged because of it's potential to become financially rewarded enough to threaten the cabal of which you're a part of loss of it's control of the rewards pool, AFAICT. It's flagged because the political views he expresses do not dovetail with whatever political views ya'll want expressed on Hive.
Hive could be a platform that enables voluntarist governments to replace legacy tyrannies, except for the censorship you and your cabal effect. You're smarter than I am. You could prolly devise code that could enable such voluntarist governments to be undertaken on Hive without suffering the economic suppression that makes attempting them futile. However, it seems your pecuniary interest in your personal financial growth is more valuable to you than a free world.
While I don't care about my financial power because I depend on goodwill for my economic survival, my intellectual capacity is inadequate, or I would have done it long ago. Hive is kneecapped by the ability of whales to maintain control of the rewards pool by flagging. I probably would never have grasped this except ya'll flag to suppress political content, trolls, and free speech whales find distasteful. @logiczombie and @baah have never been a threat to the rewards pool, never spammed or scammed anyone, but their content has been suppressed no less than @dollarvigilante's. Little guys like @skeptic were crushed by one whale.
Until there's some limitation on the ability to flag accounts into the dust for opinion, the extant cabal will maintain it's total economic control of the majority of rewards, and that makes Hive unable to provide actual freedom of speech that potentially challenges tyranny, whether of Hive or legacy governments.
I posted the other comment just before now.
Your opinion on why we flag things is out of date.
Join the hive-dr discord and see for yourself what we do.
https://discord.gg/tVjRSwTG9v
I do agree that 2016 through 2018 was a different consensus.
Not near as broad.
However, the whales are much less involved than they were then.
The removal of the bernster made voicing opinions contrary to his much less hazardous.
Time was when he wiped dozens for daring to differ, now is not that time.
If you care to put links in freezpeach, https://discord.gg/TXPkMRXYuG, they will get looked at by the hive-dr group for defensive actions and restorative votes.
There is very little abuse for opinions since the fork.
Please offer links to evidence I am wrong.
I am not afraid of being corrected.
It won't be the first time I have had to admit that my opinion was wrong.
Thank you for the Discord link, joined!
https://discord.gg/SUwJ2s2
This is another server to spread to ya'll's users, it is 'the official' hive discord server.
Any questions about hive can be asked in there and will receive a responsive answer, generally pretty quick.
And to be specific, berwick is monetizing videos he didn't create and offering that he sends the creators the money.
We don't accept that excuse that from others, we won't accept it from him.
I've advocated that any videos with beneficiaries set to the original creators not be flagged, but separating them is time consuming.
Better that the original creators post them on their own accounts.
Just a heads up, @kencode is right now implementing so we can set creators with no Hive account to "decline payment".
That will solve this issue as far as I am concerned.
We are only looking for an equal application of the rules.
The standard is original content every time, or decline/burn the rewards.
That isn't too much to ask in light of the number of spammers/plagiarizers we have driven from the pool up to this point.
I will make a post as soon as it is implemented, have made it #1 priority!
Wonderful, thank you for your attention to the matter.
All posts now decline payouts: https://peakd.com/hive/@michaelnyboebach/vigilantetv-or-all-payouts-for-posts-now-declined
Seems like it'd be pretty simple to sort that with a bot, but what do I know?
Maybe if ya'll didn't flag original content creators whose opinions you don't like off the platform, reposts wouldn't be the only source on Hive for that content. If you don't like it being reposted, don't flag the creators off Hive. Disagreement of opinion is the whole reason free speech is useful. The flagging of creators is just cancel culture on Hive.
Is it profitable to cancel people by flagging them off Hive? I wouldn't have thought you would want to profit by that means, even if it was profitable. It just seems like killing Hive to me, not even harming those creators much, since they just post elsewhere. Hive has so much potential, it's sad to see it killed one creator at a time, when it could instead enable a diversity of voluntarist governments to replace the corrupt legacy tyrannies destroying themselves around the world today.
I guess I'll have to watch the slow death of that potential until a successor that does prevent opinion flagging arises, and others enable that platform to moon when they don't kill it with cancel culture.
Give me a link, or a name, to that happening in the last 2 years.
What is killing hive is people having their facts wrong, braying loudly, and giving us an undeserved bad reputation.
Stinc kneecapped us intentionally, we still haven't recovered from that.
People are not getting driven from the platform unless they are clearly abusive.
If you think otherwise, provide the facts.
@logiczombie. Still votes but no longer posts, because they can't post without getting flagged by massive stake. @baah. Still posting despite being flagged into the negative, because they're obstinate. @lucylin. Flagged off the platform. @worldtravelpro. Flagged off the platform. @r0nd0n still a witness and still running @freezepeach AFAIK, but last post was last October and flagged to zero by Marky (and himself. He's known to do that from time to time). @kennyskitchen. Flagged off the platform. @lukewearechange. Still posting (or posting again after a hiatus), still getting flagged to zero most every time. @dbroze. Getting flagged hard, still posting. I myself have been only mildly flagged since the Bern ended, and that despite riling Marky excessively, for which I grant him credit due.
If I hadn't wanted to spare you I could keep going, and I cleaned out the list I follow a few months ago, so I'm prolly missing many.
That's vague, and ill defined. Some of my favorite people - like you - are clearly abusive. I think you called me a Communist once. The audacity! I really admire audacity, so thanks for that. On second thought, you might have called yourself a Communist. My recollection is vague.
Some of the above list are excellent reporters and prolific posters, while some are obnoxious trolls. I reckon we need both ends of that spectrum. I also don't think you're the kingpin and ringleader of the cabal, and suspect you're there to make the difference that seems to be why @ura-soul isn't on that list, despite he was flagged like a Panamanian freighter for months. That flagging seems to have mysteriously stopped after he recommended voting for a certain witness that shall not be named (just to seem mysterious. I don't think that particular witness is the reason, and think I vote them too).
So, thanks for that hard work I reckon you're doing.
If people posting stupid and incorrect stuff is killing Hive, we're doomed along with all other places people post. Nowhere more than Twatter, Fakebook, or Youtool.
I want you to know I sincerely appreciate you stepping into the fray. Thank you.
@baah is enlightened, unlike your feeble-minded self. He doesn't give a damn, and I commend him for that. He knows his words will never fade away no matter who thinks can "censor" him.
@logiczombie can do whatever he wants. He has his posting keys.
Lucy is just here for the money. Pretty easy to see why he left in a hurry when it's no longer yields financial rewards. But hey, let's pretend posting is the only way to earn on the chain after all these years.
Worldtravelpro was outted for recycling his content which people used to curate him did not like. Then, proceeded to libel everyone who was once his benefactor when they no longer wanted to vote on his stuff.
@freezepeach is still operational. Not that you would know that. @r0nd0n is not weak like others who decided to censor themselves. He's actively doing other things and he is a mid-level witness on the chain. By your definition, he might as well be part of the cabal because he collaborates with many people you detest.
I think your reading comprehension is inadequate, because you inform me of what I have stated. Anywho, @antisocialist asked for a list, so there is a list. You misapprehend me grievously, and ascribe to me feelings that I don't have.
I am cut to the quick, wounded to my core. I will go have a sad now, while I mourn the consequences you will bear due to your misunderstanding.
You will bear the consequences of your understanding, or lack of it, without exception. Nothing I can do about that except to state precisely what I mean, which I did as best I could.
I'm one guy. My voice doesn't dictate what others do.
As I recall, that group eventually resorted to doing stuff like this:
Actions were taken against them. It's not as black and white as everyone else tries to make them.
We got this email from Dan Dicks of PressForTruth yesterday:
Max Igan messaged me this yesterday:
These are just a couple of creators, but it is the general sentiment unfortunately. None of them knows excaclty why they get hammered or by who, it's just game over. So let's turn it around and make Hive explode!
Here is an image of the last 3 posts from Dan Dicks before he stopped.
Max Igan's account is posting now, and has posted a couple time in the last month.
https://peakd.com/@maxigan
His last post.
https://peakd.com/hive-160545/@maxigan/enxsqtdr
So, some clarification may be advisable to see if he's posting, someone is posting on his behalf, or is posting from his hacked account.
Now declining payouts on all posts :) https://peakd.com/hive/@michaelnyboebach/vigilantetv-or-all-payouts-for-posts-now-declined
Dude already mentioned how Hive is almost worthless. (@11:13 or so)
Why the hell do the dumb whales and "community" keep supporting garbage people like this?
He says dollars is worthless, not Hive.
You are correct. I misunderstood.
Are there whales who support this channel? I'm not updated, but think #FreeSpeech is at least being neutral about content categories.
It's the typical bunch. Follow the vote trails.
The problem is always the rewards. You've learned that from D.buzz.
I'm cynical and believe nobody truly cares about free speech. People care about "their speech". This is why something like Truth Social is much more attractive than any other open source option.
#FreeSpeech is important, but I have come to find that #Freedom is gained individually, through Right Speech, Right Action, etc. regardless of the state of the world, and'or the state of social media platforms . . this is the primary issue that each of us must individually address . . no one else will save us, no one can and no one may.
#Kamma (cause and effect).
Right Speech and Right Action sound Buddhist - from the 8 fold path.
Free speech is far more valuable than mere money, but it is impossible to speak without some money, so utterly crushing accounts financially completely destroys free speech. The only reason I have been able to remain on Hive is because I do not use Hive tokens as money. Ironic, eh? I am only here for the free speech, and despite my present complaints about Hive's ability to enable people to speak freely, it is the least censored site I am familiar with.
That makes me very sad, because it is clearly obvious that Hive is censored by you and your cabal.
Yeah, this type of talking point is where you lose all the credibility to your "holier than thou" attitude.
My wallet is public, and you are free to prove me wrong.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censorship
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cabal
If you don't like the facts I stated, you alone can change what you do so those facts no longer apply to you.
LOL okay.
He brings in eyeballs?
Check how many people he referred to Hive.
Yes, I am aware, he brought me here when I had to go to reddit and beg an upvote so I would have positive karma to qualify for an account here.
I have been defending him in the conversations.
Not when he monetizes the content of others, but when he does original content of his own.
Time constraints often don't allow the differentiation by the mean whales, they just downvote it all classifying him as a mass abuser.
When other mass plagiarizers get wiped they don't get the differentiation, either.
Understood. We will address this asap!
What eyeballs?
People already watching them aren't coming to Hive and are not doing it on Hive.
I came to hive because of Jeff Berwick. Can I just say this, or does it get me downvoted for political reasons, which aren't even political? It's more like nonsense. Politics were invented to divide us. And so was money. It's just another divide and rule tool.
I can't speak for other people.
You do whatever you want.
I do whatever I think is right. Whatever I FEEL is right rather. I feel people who have certain opinions, based on facts that are not particularly popular with certain globalist organisations are being discriminated here.
The https://Vigilante.tv website is a hybrid site, of #PeerTube and #HIVE.
As I've said to you in dms, let's hope this translates to people having their own digital identity (a la Hive account).
I'm not saying what he's done is not impressive. It's good for him and maybe good for the content creator. But, I am yet to be convinced that it would translate into people jumping on Hive. There's not really an incentive for it.
A good indicator would be the comments he and others receive via HiveTube . . doing nothings and discouraging use cases for #Hive isn't the way imo.
You, @antisocialist, and @markymark are members of a cabal that selectively flag accounts into the dust for political disagreement. For years I have watched as people like @skeptic, @logiczombie, and now @baah, who do not plagiarize, nor wallow in rewards, who do not spam nor scam, are flagged until their accounts are unusable, and their followers and people that comment on their posts are threatened with the same treatment.
Why would anyone intent on voicing their political opinion come to Hive to do so, when you and your ilk are here waiting to smash them with the bulk of economic power on a platform that equates economic stake and the power of speech?
Maybe refugees from cancel culture would come here, if cancel culture wasn't here waiting for them.
Is peer tube immutable similar to what 3speak is doing?
Peertube is server software from Framasoft. It uses webtorrent, HLS and activitypub protocol to stream a/v content to client devices P2P (see "Fediverse"). It's not a blockchain, however if you install the Hive-Tube plugin onto a Peertube server, then the content can be monetized.
Videos can be removed from Peertube servers, just like 3speak servers, so those videos are not immutable. The blockchain that those videos get connected to, Hive in this case, is immutable.
Wonderful.
Thanks for the effort you are putting into this.
Once we sort the rewards pool issues it should be smooth sailing.
From what I understand, it uses #IPFS and a #Federation system, where other PeerTube instances can host the content of any other instance.
Can you clarify @kencode, and did I get it right.
Posted via D.Buzz
Peertube servers support remote storage.. S3, wasabi, minio, etc. IPFS is not recommended for streaming media though (even with our lightweight C-IPFS implementation) and afaik has not been added as an option to their server software.
Maybe not, but they get a Hive account and get exposed to content on the Hive chain. They also comment and vote helping Hive grow and maybe even to rise the value of Hive :)