The cheek of some people. Really gets on my nerves this sort of thing.
Should verification be made standard practice going forward, or is it still up to 'us' to do it?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The cheek of some people. Really gets on my nerves this sort of thing.
Should verification be made standard practice going forward, or is it still up to 'us' to do it?
Does that help?
or does it give us a "false sense of security".
Does what help? Verifying people?
Edit: yes and perhaps.
Yes, I'm asking how &/or why verification might help.
'bad' people can get get past any 'gatekeeper'
'good' people just give away ID info.
Multiple accounts are fine by me for a number of reasons.
It's the accounts that are mainly showing themselves eating food in a bikini on a deserted island in Indonesia that need to prove it is them with the 100,000 Instagram followers.
I don't need to prove who I am, my 'business' is not built around my 6 pack - because i don't pretend to have one.
There are easy ways to prove who you say you are. A picture of you, with your steemit login, and today's date (newspaper).
I am interested in the "number of reasons" as I said.
To me it creates an unlevel playing field (#votes /person/day )
and adds to the 'fictional' char problem.
Security
A 'community' account like @curie/@ocd/@steemitblog/cheetah/@spaminator/@minnowsupport /bidbots
steemvoter account to vote a subset of your total SP to people and communities you wish to support longer term
Testing
Zappl
To focus on individual subject areas
I think others could add to that list easily.
Thanks for info.