Do not say what I should read.
Answer a simple question. There is a fact - the case when the vaccine caused damage to the child. Is this sufficient reason for refusing to practice vaccination?? For me, this is a sufficient reason for stopping vaccination. If for you the child's health is not an indicator, then further dialogue does not make sense.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I simply don't believe it was the vaccines that are to blame. We have been vaccinating people for decades, and all of a sudden, a bunch of people have a problem with them.
I truly believe that any such cases of "vaccine injury" were due to unforeseen immunodeficiencies in the children. Call it an alergic reaction that could not have been predicted. Plenty of children get vaccines, and come out of it healthier than ever, and that's why my children will receive the full schedule.
The daughter of my relatives after the vaccination became deaf and dumb. And your faith or not faith will not help her. And other children who take risks every time they are injected.
You can not argue that children after vaccination have become healthier. To make such a comparison, two parallel universes are needed. In one of them, children received vaccines. The other did not receive. Only in this case there is an adequate comparison.