A French MD, orthopaedic surgeon, oncologist and statistician named Gérard Delépine has analyzed the HPV vaccine Gardasil and published his results on an independent news site called Agora Vox. His research shows that higher rates of cervical cancer correlate with increased rates of Gardasil vaccinations.
Source, Source, Source
An English version can be found published today on Dr. Delépine's personal site. It was originally sent as an "Open letter to parliamentarians, and to all citizens" as a response to French politicians calling for mandatory Gardasil vaccination. He co-founded the UK Association of HPV Vaccine Injured Daughters (AHVID) in 2015, so he is familiar with the Gardasil issue.
Dr. Delépine correct some parts of a French bill that asks for mandatory vaccination:
"There are more than one hundred and twenty kinds of human papillomavirus (HPV), and fifteen are considered to be at high risk because they can cause cancers including HPV 16 and 18 causing 70% of infections." But this only demonstrates a statistical correlation between presence of HPV and cancer, without anyone being so far able to demonstrate a direct CAUSALITY link.
Dr. Delépine explains that there is no strong evidence Gardasil protects against cancer, and points out that it only targets 2-5% of the 200 known strains of the human papillomavirus (HPV). The data he has gathered shows how ignorant the politicians are of the issue, as "some MPs want to impose a vaccination that can increase the risk of cervical cancer, as proven by international publications of national cancer registries."
Cervical cancer was decreasing in several countries he pulled statical data from pap smears. Conversely, in countries where mass Gardasil vaccination took place there are more cases of cervical cancer. France is one of those countries that still has a lower rate of Gardasil vaccination, and Dr. Delépine wants to keep it that way. He is urging French politicians to not make the mistake of making the Gardasil vaccination mandatory.
The French bill makes false claims to justify their move to mandate the harmful Gardasil vaccine, and Dr. Delépine correct their falsity again:
"In Australia, where 80% of women and 75% of men are vaccinated, cases of HPV lesions have almost disappeared." But, this statement is outrageous, as the following presentation will show you, because in this highly vaccinated country the number of cervical cancers (and other cancers attributed to HPV) continue to increase.
In Sweden, the campaign to vaccinate against cervical cancer shows how much the incidence rate of invasive cancer among women has increased:
Sweden, according to the National Kvalitetsregister for Cervix Cancer prevention (NKCx ): before the vaccination campaign, the incidence of cervical cancer had decreased (thanks to screening) from 18 in 1967 to 7 in 2006. The worldwide standardized incidence of cervical cancer has increased significantly since vaccination rising to 10.3 in 2012 and 11.5 in 2015. This increase is almost exclusively due to the increase in the incidence of invasive cancer among women aged 23 to 49, which has reached more than 50% since 2006 (11 in 2006 versus 17 in 2015), whereas it is those who have the highest vaccination coverage rate (85%).
Source
In the UK, when the vaccine started to be implemented, the incidence rate shot up:
Source
In some countries, campaigns for vaccination were halted after severee vaccine injuries resulted and people protested what was done to them under the guise and promise of protecting them:
Japan, Austria and Denmark have stopped promoting this vaccination after serious complications, sometimes even fatal and that families suffering from these vaccines organized public demonstrations in several countries of the world (Japan, Colombia, Ireland), and that Danish doctors lodged a complaint against the European Medicines Agency (EMA), which refused to answer the questions they asked.
Frequent injuries from the vaccines are "include multiple sclerosis, lupus, disseminated acute encephalomyelitis (inflammation of the central nervous system) and myofasciitis macrophages (a disease that results in pain muscle and chronic fatigue)".
Dr. Delépine concludes that the benefit-risk ratio is not in favor of vaccination, and certainly shouldn't be made compulsory. Issuing a compulsory vaccination program based on faith, and not facts, with hidden conflicts of interest, should be known to all citizens before politicians can force potential or likely harm onto them. the HPV vaccine doesn't show a protection against invasive cervical cancer, but keeps it at a high level or may even increase it.
Dr. Delépine urges to "fight against this bill that threatens our children, by informing everyone, our MP, our senator, our elected officials, that no one may be unaware. ... Let's apply the precautionary principle! Let us respect the right of every human being to informed choice/consent for medical interventions!".
If you're family has someone going for a Gardasil vaccination, please get them to rethink it, especially if they are female. There are many cases you can find online of people being vaccine injured from Gardasil. At least one girl ended up being paralyzed. People need to really educate themselves and think if the risk is worth it. It wouldn't be for me.
Thank you for your time and attention. Peace.
References:
- Gardasil, alerte, risque imminent d'obligation d'une vaccination anti HPV inutile, et parfois dangereuse, pour les filles et garçons
- Gardasil alert, imminent risk of unnecessary and sometimes dangerous HPV vaccination for girls and boys.
If you appreciate and value the content, please consider: Upvoting, Sharing or Reblogging below.
me for more content to come!
My goal is to share knowledge, truth and moral understanding in order to help change the world for the better. If you appreciate and value what I do, please consider supporting me as a Steem Witness by voting for me at the bottom of the Witness page.
So I guess one important question would be does the 2-5% of the the known strains of HPV targeted by the vaccine overlap with the 15 high risk strains? According to the Wikipedia page on Gardasil it does making the fact that it only targets 2-5% of the total strains completely irrelevant.
And then goes on to make an argument based on statistical correlation that the vaccine causes cancer. However, the assertion that a statistical correlation is the only evidence that HPV causes cancer is untrue. The process by which certain strains of HPV cause cancer is fairly well understood.
In addition, the U.K. graph doesn't even seem to indicate a statistical correlation with Gardasil and an increase in cancer. There was a sharp rise but it dropped sharply again. It's also important to note that cancer is a disease that typically develops many years after exposure to whatever causes it. After becoming infected with HPV, it is typically 10-30 years before cancer develops. How are any of the current statistical correlations with the vaccine and cancer even relevant given how long it takes for cancer to develop and the relatively short amount of time this vaccine has been widely used? Whether the vaccine causes or prevents cancer, you aren't going to see that data in the year or two following an increase in use. It would be many years down the road.
My guess is that if there is a statistical correlation, it was brought on by an increased awareness after the introduction of the vaccine and more people being diagnosed in a shorter period of time. That might explain why the U.K. graph had a sharp rise and then dropped again sharply in a short amount of time. I wouldn't expect to see a noticeable drop on the graph due to the vaccine until at least 2019 (assuming vaccination started in 2009) and wouldn't reach it's new normal level until 2039.
I don't know if Gardasil is safe or not but this article makes some pretty questionable arguments and the available solid data would seem to indicate that it is safe. HPV causes 70% of cervical cancer and also causes other kinds of cancer to a lesser but still very significant degree. A vaccine is a good thing.
I see, thanks for the analysis :) The vaccine is not necessarily a good thing though. There some women who become infertile among other injuries.
Vaccinations have great potential for life saving benefits, but the manufacturers are screwing it up with poor quality ingredients, manufacturing process failures, and dishonest testing.
Sure they could be much better. It's definitely being fucked up.
Curated for #informationwar (by @openparadigm)
Our purpose is to encourage posts discussing Information War, Propaganda, Disinformation and other false narratives. We currently have over 7,500 Steem Power and 20+ people following the curation trail to support our mission.
Join our discord and chat with 250+ fellow Informationwar Activists.
Join our brand new reddit! and start sharing your Steemit posts directly to The_IW, via the share button on your Steemit post!!!
Connect with fellow Informationwar writers in our Roll Call! InformationWar - Leadership/Contributing Writers/Supporters: Roll Call
Ways you can help the @informationwar
I added @krnel to good bloggers
https://www.goodbloggers.com/blogger/KrNel
Site that will help people to find good bloggers. 7 months in development.
Please Help to survive this project. upvote or resteem or transfer some steem
very good posts. keep on being big brother
Nyc post. Stay blessed.
Vaccines have a lot of adverse reactions that are damaging. Google the national vaccine injury court and see how often vaccines maim and kill people. We only get the ones that are mandatory for school. And even then we would opt out if we could.