Thank you for contributing. The mock ups are of good quality and the way you have edited them is simple but efficient. Good work!Hello @c-diamond.
Coming to the review, the components section (which hasn't been highlighted in your contribution) needs to more specific about the features or components of the application your suggestion relates to.
The PO wanted this application to be simple and implementation of the suggested features might differ from the main goal of the application, however I do hope that the PO will consider the suggested features and you can let him/her know simply by suggesting the same features on github.
Do you know that you can use markdown to make your post a little more professional! Well, now you do and I will look forward to see a better formatted contribution next time.
REPLACE WITH FEEDBACK
Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.
To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.
Need help? Chat with us on Discord.
And I don't think the value is ¬Negligible added-value to the project / impossible or extremely difficult implementation is required.¬
Value is negligible in a sense that developer wants to keep the application simple which means although you suggested good features, they might not get the po's attention just because the suggested features don't match the goal of the app.
And please don't mind the second part, it is the way questionnaire has been implemented.
Thank u @syedumair, i like your feedback, I am new on steemit and I just have little information about utopian and steemit. I will appreciate it if you help with tutorials about markdowns, and I have one question; How did u know the PO won't like to improve his/her project?
Thank you for your review, @syedumair! Keep up the good work!