You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Introducing !sources

in #utopian-io6 years ago (edited)

That means someone is using a YouTube video as the sole content to be voted on. Sometimes, they do pretend that is their video.

Some go as far as bidding them. Then, they would say they are "sharing content", but the need to buy votes seems unnecessary. Especially when there exist people who do that several times a time as "posts".

In this context, it involves curators. So, it is assumed that "content sharer" is trying to receive votes from curators for "not their work".

Sort:  

Sharing a video is sharing a video, you need to update your ideology and introduce reforms, like this excellent idea from markymark that will help user retention if its used before someone gets attack flagged.

Read my comment again.

Trying to receive votes from curators with content that is not theirs.

I don't post very often, but when I do, I purchase some Steem and spend it (promotion bots), if more people did this, the price of Steem would increase.

Creating "original content" and then cashing out your earnings, puts a downward pressure on the Steem price.


"Most curators are looking for original work"

NO unfortunately the majority of curators are looking for a return on their vote and following the money! Get real please!

I wonder why nobody invests in this place?

If you want more people to invest in Steem then collectively, we Steemian's need to stop doing stuff that is detrimental to investing!

  1. Stop blaming bid bots for everything, they drive the creation & money flow of Steem (growth) and put an upward pressure on the Steem price!

  2. Stop censoring / scaring away users indiscriminately @amnlive is a recent example.

  3. Stop giving bid bot users a bad experience, by robbing them first with no capped losses and then finishing them off with indiscriminate flagging.

Yes, printing more liquid Steem totally increases price. /s

So according to you we should restrict the money supply (decrease growth) and just allow its use for the "worthy ones?" Lol 😀

Your words. Not mine. Lol

If I wish to share a video and then pump it with bid bots, that is perfectly fine, your comment states that is not the case.

Expect to get flagged, then.

In fact, you'll probably get flagged from @themarkymark too. Do as you wish.

You need to reform, why get offended and attack someone if they want to promote an excellent video that they have found?

Bid bot usage helps the Steemit economy.

I'm gonna pretend you have reading comprehension issues.

Most curators are looking for original work. Are you the type of guy that shares someone else's stuff and tag #artzone + bid bots?

This utility is a tool for curators to remind people that what they "shared" is not acceptable for the curators to vote on.

Bid bot usage helps the Steemit economy.

Let me guess, no flags? So, your bots are literally the classic scam of "give me a dollar, I'll give you two." I wonder why nobody invests in this place.

I don't post very often, but when I do, I purchase some Steem and spend it (promotion bots), if more people did this, the price of Steem would increase.

Creating "original content" and then cashing out your earnings, puts a downward pressure on the Steem price.


"Most curators are looking for original work"

NO unfortunately the majority of curators are looking for a return on their vote and following the money! Get real please!

I wonder why nobody invests in this place?

If you want more people to invest in Steem then collectively, we Steemian's need to stop doing stuff that is detrimental to investing!

  1. Stop blaming bid bots for everything, they drive the creation & money flow of Steem (growth) and put an upward pressure on the Steem price!
  2. Stop censoring / scaring away users indiscriminately @amnlive is a recent example.
  3. Stop giving bid bot users a bad experience, by robbing them first with no capped losses and then finishing them off with indiscriminate flagging.