not a domination by the ones that have DHF support.
If you could elaborate on this it would help me better understand the suggested negative side of DHF
I have given some thoughts about this option for funding my projects and at some point I may submit a proposal for funding. However, I have other options for project funding so it would be my way of testing and learning more about this aspect of Hive. And I would do it as a process improvement or problem solving initiative.
we pay for everything that comes out of the DHF by devaluating our own assets...
I need more information to follow this thought. How do we devalue our own asset? You mean our Hive holding or layer 2 token holdings?
!CENT
If you take Ecency, Peakd and Inleo they all have the support of the DHF either for their front-end or for another service that they provide, meaning they get hundreds of dollars every day from the DHF Check proposals. If somebody would want to develop a new front-end app, he would have to compete with these apps that have DHF support and that can provide a service that is seen as free by the users. However, it's not free because all the money that is paid through the DHF has a direct influence on the supply of hive. This is basically printed money and an inflation that is paid by all the people who own Hive.