You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: A thread from our slack chatroom

in #trading7 years ago

Thanks for the feedback. I certainly wouldn't rely solely on the scanner for trades. Rather, I consider the scanner to be analogous to a tutor. I do the work on my own, but the scanner helps provide both positive and negative feedback, to either validate or invalidate my answer. The "answer" in this context would be my identification of a base. Now, I couldn't trust the robots enough to make all of my decisions, eh? :)

I'm definitely looking forward to participating in the Slack channel when it's more accessible!

Thanks for all of your contributions - I hope I get a chance to return the favor.

Sort:  

The robot is not good enough, you cannot trust it. It's a rough guide, but it's far less accurate than you can be. There are frequently false triggers because it's logic is very basic. It's good for catching ideas you ,ugh the have overlooked, but you cannot trust the bot to do the work for you - even a beginner will do a better job than the bot. Strange, but true!