He is a right-wing collectivist who does not believe in individual freedom, acceptance and reciprocity, religious freedom nor in rule of law. Because individuals as him want to use the government and coercion against Muslims, refugees, "elites" etc.
"Muslim Rape Jihad"? Well in a civilized and free society one is treated as an individual. Meaning, that accusing a certain behaviour on basis of a relgion that is global and practiced in different contexts is not credible and honest thing to do.
In principle, if one is a nationalist one does not value freedom and pluralism. Especially when we speak about white nationalists who believe in creation of an ethno-state
kidnapping of christians girls throughout the muslim world with forced conversion and marriage.
All these people believe that Islam sanctions their behaviour and in the case of number 4 their laws and governments agree, were the crusades and the inquisition not Catholic?
Well in a civilized and free society one is treated as an individual.
And yet you paint all nationalists with one brush and claim to know what they value.
In principle, if one is a nationalist one does not value freedom and pluralism.
Wrong.
Especially when we speak about white nationalists who believe in creation of an ethno-state
I don't know why you bring up ethno-nationalists but since you did let's speak plainly, Islam is an ethno-nationalist ideology seeking to turn the world into an Islamic Caliphate through the total war of Jihad .
Europe and Europeans remember the Razzia and your namesake Vlad the Impaler Did Nothing Wrong
I do not see how Boko Haram, ISIS and rude individuals with some Pakistani identification are representing the majority or even same social contexts. That would by like saying that Christianity is bad because of KKK, white nationalists and Cossack units in Ukraine. Or that Christianity is bad because it "has an agenda" of dominating the world. Also, ISIS is mainly killing other Muslims so Muslims are statistically the largest statistical category when looking on the victims of terrorism. And I do not see how people as Robinson are doing something good in this case. Because such individuals are militants and playing on fear. People as Tommy do not care about civilized behaviour, freedom and rule of law.
They don't necessarily represent the majority but they do represent the ideology with scriptural justification, whether you agree with their interpretation or not.
Or that Christianity is bad because it "has an agenda" of dominating the world.
It is how christianity wants to dominate the world by witnessing or in Arabic Dawah. Jihad is another matter. Christianity has been used to justify horrible atrocities the Albigensian Crusade or violence against homos in Africa for example, see how easy it is to find an example of religious intolerance and admit it. I didn't make excuses I just admitted it.
People as Tommy do not care about civilized behaviour, freedom and rule of law.
Show me one example of video of Tommy Robinson saying anything that backs up your many claims about Tommy, you still haven't done that. Do you have any actual reason for your opinion of him that doesn't come from opinion pieces.
If I understand you right. You want to fight an extreme ideology with another extreme ideology? What is is the difference if both ideologies are similar? For example, by collectivist and authoritarian world view on humans and religion.
Well in this video, Tommy was not violent and extreme as usual when he is sitting in a sofa or similar. We all have our cosy modes in life.
This article accuses Tommy of acts that are crimes in the UK, why hasn't he been charged with any of these crimes, I'll tell you why, these are all false allegations.
He is a right-wing collectivist who does not believe in individual freedom, acceptance and reciprocity, religious freedom nor in rule of law. Because individuals as him want to use the government and coercion against Muslims, refugees, "elites" etc.
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47371290
No he is a Nationalist who believes in individual freedom,
Name one action of his showing he doesn't believe in these things,
No, he wants Muslims treated equally under the law, not having their crimes covered up for decades like the Muslim Rape Jihad.
"Muslim Rape Jihad"? Well in a civilized and free society one is treated as an individual. Meaning, that accusing a certain behaviour on basis of a relgion that is global and practiced in different contexts is not credible and honest thing to do.
In principle, if one is a nationalist one does not value freedom and pluralism. Especially when we speak about white nationalists who believe in creation of an ethno-state
Boko Haram
Isis
Pakistani rape gangs in Britain
kidnapping of christians girls throughout the muslim world with forced conversion and marriage.
All these people believe that Islam sanctions their behaviour and in the case of number 4 their laws and governments agree, were the crusades and the inquisition not Catholic?
And yet you paint all nationalists with one brush and claim to know what they value.
Wrong.
I don't know why you bring up ethno-nationalists but since you did let's speak plainly, Islam is an ethno-nationalist ideology seeking to turn the world into an Islamic Caliphate through the total war of Jihad .
Europe and Europeans remember the Razzia and your namesake Vlad the Impaler Did Nothing Wrong
I do not see how Boko Haram, ISIS and rude individuals with some Pakistani identification are representing the majority or even same social contexts. That would by like saying that Christianity is bad because of KKK, white nationalists and Cossack units in Ukraine. Or that Christianity is bad because it "has an agenda" of dominating the world. Also, ISIS is mainly killing other Muslims so Muslims are statistically the largest statistical category when looking on the victims of terrorism. And I do not see how people as Robinson are doing something good in this case. Because such individuals are militants and playing on fear. People as Tommy do not care about civilized behaviour, freedom and rule of law.
They don't necessarily represent the majority but they do represent the ideology with scriptural justification, whether you agree with their interpretation or not.
It is how christianity wants to dominate the world by witnessing or in Arabic Dawah. Jihad is another matter. Christianity has been used to justify horrible atrocities the Albigensian Crusade or violence against homos in Africa for example, see how easy it is to find an example of religious intolerance and admit it. I didn't make excuses I just admitted it.
Show me one example of video of Tommy Robinson saying anything that backs up your many claims about Tommy, you still haven't done that. Do you have any actual reason for your opinion of him that doesn't come from opinion pieces.
If I understand you right. You want to fight an extreme ideology with another extreme ideology? What is is the difference if both ideologies are similar? For example, by collectivist and authoritarian world view on humans and religion.
Well in this video, Tommy was not violent and extreme as usual when he is sitting in a sofa or similar. We all have our cosy modes in life.
https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-47371290
This article accuses Tommy of acts that are crimes in the UK, why hasn't he been charged with any of these crimes, I'll tell you why, these are all false allegations.
It is not only about eventual crime, but about his behaviour and agenda. The guy does not stand for things as rule of law and civilized society