It's a report as most of them mention, just because you didn't get voted because you probably do well enough doesn't mean that they're "leeching rewards" from others content because they decided to highlight your post as one of the better posts that day in that community. I really disagree with you on this and hope you realize how bad it sounds at some point.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
My opinion is not based on the example I gave. Most of the reports are wrong.
I would like to see weekly reports with the best posts of that week and an explanation of why it was chosen from the official account. This would indeed add value, as we would see the expert opinion of the moderators. Copying and pasting posts daily doesn't seem of value to me and I don't think it will change minds...nor do I think it will change the opinion of the community that has normalized it.
I can't speak for all communities but there is a lot of work that goes into properly curating posts. You won't see our curators for instance voting on authors that I mentioned here that get thousands of hive per week but haven't commented in over a month or don't get any engagement. It also prevents curators from trying to do shady stuff like voting sockpuppets and too much on friends, etc since they already receive rewards for curating. Not to mention creating a list of people that shouldn't be curated for different reasons and checking they aren't on that list along with finding abusers and downvoting them. It's a lot more work than just voting for some accounts daily.