You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: @haejin

in #thisisfun7 years ago

I think you mean 'They use the steem chain and mechanism exactly as it is supposed to work?' Certainly that is one point of view, but others seem to think Steemit also has something to do with quality content creation.

The main point in @berniesanders argument (once you clear all the profanity out the way) appears to be that one account has found a way to take a larger share of the pool. Now, you could call that unfair or you could tell everyone else to compete better - either way, the solution lies in the design of the mechanism/platform rather than attacking one individual account.

My point, is that @haejin is not an individual, but a corporation, so attacking it like it cares or is going to respond is a waste of time and effort - the employees will just follow the business plan regardless. That should have been obvious to anyone prepared to do a little research rather than just rant and rave. If you want to take on @haejin, you have to take it on as a corporation not an individual.

Now imagine what Steemit will look like when many corporations have purchased themselves whale status. Good for Steem maybe, but not so good for Steemit.

Sort:  

That is still the way steem is made, means it is as intended.

That this is totally unfair distribution of wealth from down to top is true even without big corporations.
Steem is a pure capitalistic system, nothing more, nothing less.