I think that a large group of people with shared interests, such as a nation, require at least some form of a governing body and in the real world, governments have done that job for centuries, and it has worked quite well.
But, in the more recent times, we have time and again gotten countless examples of a saying that goes, “Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely.”
We all know first hand or through the experiences of someone else, that people in power often tend to be corrupt and at the highest level, that means that entire countries are not able to be run properly.
I don’t want to go too much into details, but I would just like to say that a lot of the governments of the world have proven themselves ineffective and inefficient to run a country, solve its problems and work for the welfare of the citizens.
What Is The Alternative?
Whenever something doesn’t work, what do we do? At first we try to fix it and if even after that it doesn’t work, we start looking for alternatives. If there is one thing that I’m sure about, it’s that governments can’t be fixed.
If you think I’m being over dramatic, you should visit some of the developing countries of the world and look for reasons why they are still ‘developing’ even after decades of work. I’m sure the inefficiencies of a government are present elsewhere too, but it is certainly more visible in this part of the world.
I am not an anarchist and as I said, I think there has to be some sort of governing body to keep us humans in check. Without rules and regulations, I fear what we would become as a species. So, the major question that I want to ask, and also discuss a radical solution to, is this: “What can be a viable alternative to a government?”
I have always looked towards technological innovation for the solutions to the problems of humanity and I was thinking the other day whether AI could be the alternative we are looking for. This idea is certainly not new but I was trying to mull over the idea.
Does AI Have The Answer?
If you keep up with the news, you must be well aware that AI has been progressing by leaps and bounds and the exponential growth in this field will mean a highly intelligent artificial intelligent system that can rival even human intelligence pretty soon enough.
This could mean that what the governments failed to do, the AI will accomplish very easily because it won’t have the human attributes of greed and ambition or any other emotion for that matter and it will take purely logical decisions that are highly efficient and guide the country and its citizens towards prosperity. From a strictly decision making view point, there couldn’t be anything better.
But, there are two major problems with this idea. The first is that AI might end up deciding that we humans are just not worth it and could ensure our extinction or enslavement by various means. This has been shown countless times in movies.
The second problem, and something that most people don’t consider is that, the AI system would still need to be programmed periodically or at least done regular maintenance on and the people doing that would essentially be the ones with all the power. This would be an even smaller group of people and it could lead to a disastrous, dictatorial form of ‘government’.
I think we havent replaced or changed the strategy of goberment because we dont know anything else like really know something trustworthy .. but maybe we should take that first step
True! We haven't really thought about it hard enough and have just accepted it to be the only system that works. I don't know if that is a good or bad thing.
Let me give you my very initial response which is.. "Are you f'n crazy?!" You are suggesting something that is gravely dangerous for so many reasons that I can't even begin to count them!
My more tempered secondary response is to suggest you read an older article by Bill Joy who was the CTO of Sun Microsystems and who sometime back wrote an op-ed on the dangers of a number of emerging technologies with AI being one of the most important of them. I highly suggest you have a read and a very deep think on it.
https://www.wired.com/2000/04/joy-2/
My most important warning with such types of technology is that certain "genies" (like AI) when let out of their bottles are not just difficult to put back in, they are Pandora's boxes that can destroy things that the natural world has architected with beauty over billions of years. Using AI is one thing, and this is already dangerous. Making AI a master over our society is insanity and a latent death wish.
AI in a governmental form as you are suggesting, is however also the wet dream of the Technocratic elite. If you are not familiar with technocracy, I suggest you have a listen to Patrick Wood as an introduction. This should also give you some more insight on the dangers of both AI and Technocracy as governmental solutions over human beings. Interest with any advanced controlling technology by Technocrats is never to make the world a better place for you and me, but to use the technology to make an ever more perfect Orwellian, dystopic state. AI would be their perfect tool for this:
I think that you somehow misunderstood that I support the idea of an AI government. I simply do not. I am well aware of the dangers that such a thing would pose. I was merely discussing an idea as I always normally do. I invite the reader to ponder about the idea and really think about it deeply.
Good to know.. then my reply is for all your readers that appear to have taken it as a potentially good idea.
Somehow, I miss what you are after here. I'm not sure the point of writing posts like this. It simply confuses people. Why not instead take a stand on something that is seriously wrong. We have enough confused people as it is today. Why encourage more?
If you actually provided some real arguments for each side, then maybe you could act like it's about giving people an opinion on a meaningful topic. There's nothing here to do that. It's more like clickbait for people that are addicted to making ill-informed comments. I'm not sure where the benefit lies in that.
How about some kind of blockchain acting as government? Not sure how this would work but I like the idea of transparency and the trust inspired by the blockchain
That would be cool!
I really liked your blog. Keep up the good work.
BTW I'm really new to this site and have just posted my 3rd blog. My 2nd got 2 votes!! Please take a look- thanks :)
Sure! Will definitely check it out.
Thanks so much- at the moment I'm doing three pieces on a bad experience I had with the UK film industry several years ago
I haven't thought about this to be honest but yes, using blockchain would be wonderful anything public related.
But for maintaining the AI, we will again need a group of people who may be elected by the people and the execution of policies will also need humans( where maximum corruption takes place). So, at last it again comes to humans. Its a good idea but there are lots of hurdles.
Yes, that's what I thought too. At the end of the day, humans will still be involved and and in such a scenario, it will be a smaller group of people and that can get really dangerous.
agreed!
@sauravrungta have you heard about the conversation between Han and Sophia (AI machines)?
Maybe giving control to a machine that you may not be able to control if went rogue is not a good idea.
Atleast humans are mortal and can be killed if it were necessary for survival.
There have been various occasions where AI machines have said something that can send chills down the spine
One of then even said that by 2029 he will have initiated level 2 of domination over humans.
I haven't heard about their conversations but I will surely look into it. And yeah, I agree that it would be much more difficult to control a rogue AI than people.
AI in government can be one of the things Stephen Hawking is afraid of.
Stephen Hawking is not the real person
Well then.
@vox00 I wasn't aware by then, but just like you, i must have been thinking him as an immortal robot too - his death has shocked me!
This is my first post on the Steemit
https://steemit.com/conspiracy/@vox00/stephen-hawking-sad-truth
Yeah, he and some other brilliant people too and that should tell us something.
Provocative post. I agree totally with ineptitude in governments and corruption. It would be great to see this problem being addressed in some way. I could possibly see AI ha ingbsome small roles such as infrastructure management or economic management but I struggle with the idea of a complete hand over to a force we could potentially lose control over. Not sure the proper solution. Interesting thought.
Ah yes I agree with you. Humans certainly won't give complete control to an AI but may do so for smaller aspects of management of a country.
Governments have worked quite well
..
..
..
Yes, the data certainly points towards that but the general 'mentality' of people towards government has certainly shifted towards a more negative perception.
In the world of morons another AI moron is just too much
hahah yeah!!
Isn't that the claim of those who "went from the future"? I guess it's not far from reality now. Who knows Bitcoin and digital currency will exist 10 or 20 years ago? I think none because if you do,you'll be labeled "crazy". If AI will replace the government then, we better be prepared for a huge change in our lives.
The world will surely see a lot of changes in the next 20-30 years. And these changes will be certainly crazy!!
@sauravrungta (74) rather than keeping people in check as governments and rulers have done for millennia, AI would do better to act as a distributor of goods and services for the world. Perhaps this is the Crux of the problem of governments in general, that they try to control human activity instead of improving access to the fruits of Labor and the inventions of ideas 🔍📷☀️🔔💡✍️ it would be wonderful to hear you write about that☺️🎈👀
Yeah, the distribution of resources or rather the proper way of doing it has been the major problem for the governments. That's why there is so much unfair distribution of wealth.
sauravrungta (74) yes and perhaps it has something to do with the centralization of power generally. Money centralizes into fewer hands, and presents itself in the world of a self-sustaining, self-interested power instead of empowerment
But who decides whether the AI will be a right-wing AI or a left-wing AI? :D
LOL, maybe the AI will create an entirely new wing.
Or you know, a hybrid wing - leftist culturally and rightist economically and vice-versa lol.
I agree Current Govt's are not the answer to a common person problems. But I strongly believe that Human Emotions must always be a part of any form of Governance we choose. Its only the Humane side of the society that differntiates us from Machines without this Humane Side the whole society would be made into a machinary.
That is completely true. Machines ruling over wouldn't have any emotions and that would not go well with us as we are emotional beings driven by emotional agendas.
see mine vote please I ask you I am new
https://steemit.com/sexuality/@aurimar/sexuality-and-education
Please don't spam :)
I think we give our abilities way too much credit. I can't imagine that we accidentally create a new form of being that will act as capricious and violent as a human being. It is equally as likely that they help us past this destructive stage of our existence.
We anthropomorphize our worst fears onto machines, that when they become sentient, they rampage and kill us all. Why? We need to worry more about what a human can program a computer to do. We program them (drones) to kill humans in great quantities. Nuclear missiles that are fired from across the world so they hit the right spot.
AI can and will be good caretakers of our needs, and with them it will release human beings from the drudgery of slave wages so we can create a world in which human beings thrive and create and are happy! That's what I imagine anyway.
Of course we won't accidentally create a new form of being. That will take decades of development. And yes, nobody really knows what a sentient AI will be like. It could be benevolent or malevolent. There are arguments for both and both sides sound equally convincing.
really good post we should think outside of the box...
now maybe some of this people could check out my last post and make this content even more viral on INSTAGRAM please it would help a LOT!!!
Thanks!!
I believe that to think of AI as an alternative is a cop out. We should all on an individual basis take responsibility for our own actions which is not too difficult if you just follow natural law. AI has been proven to be fallible when left to its own devices even, and especially, outwith movies and would only be replacing a broken system with another.....possibly with greater implications. It is up to us and not ruling entities to get along and prosper. Peace.
Thanks for the service!