The logical fallacies are strong in this one.
I'm not mad kids get to eat. Never. But this use of STOLEN MONEY does not negate or change the FACT that TAXATION IS THEFT.
This is how they're able to get away with spending trillions on war, on local police's tanks and kevlar and paid vacations for abusing power, those camps the stolen kids at the border are imprisoned in and the guards to keep them imprisoned...remember them?
By spending a drop doing something nice, they placate you and convince you that the people that see beyond the lie are the enemy and ArE mAd KiDs GeT tO eAt.
It is not free. The government is always spending money they take by force and threats. Go ahead and accuse me of not wanting kids to eat tho lol
:)
If you would like to follow me on Steemit, please click here.
For my photography, jewelry and other stuff, please click here.
pLe0aVc3e,
》3 5 5 1《 4
∞Crypto/Voluntaryism/Ⓐnarchism/Lo♡e∞
#FreedomStartsInTheMind
Bastiat thrashed that argument in 1850.
"Socialism, like the ancient ideas from which it springs, confuses the distinction between government and society. As a result of this, every time we object to a thing being done by government, the socialists conclude that we object to its being done at all. We disapprove of state education. Then the socialists say that we are opposed to any education. We object to a state religion. Then the socialists say that we want no religion at all. We object to a state-enforced equality. Then they say that we are against equality. And so on, and so on. It is as if the socialists were to accuse us of not wanting persons to eat because we do not want the state to raise grain."― Frederic Bastiat, *The Law *