(Version originale française disponible sur https://steemit.com/surety/@willbed/l-agence-du-revenue-du-canada-vs-les-decrets-de-sa-majeste-et-mes-droits-fondamentaux)
Despite the fact that the PERSON who's SURETY I, THE MAN, have a RIGHT to, is domiciled in Quebec and that Quebec NEVER signed the canadian constitution,
And despite the fact that I do NOT endorse Canada's actions and that consequently, my PERSON has been removed from the canadian voters list,
It seems like the Canada Revenue Agency wants to force me to pay for Canada's public debts.
It's Her Majesty who enacted the Canada Revenue Agency Act ;
It's THE SAME Her Majesty who decreed, with the advice and consent of the National assembly of Quebec, the Quebec Charter of human rights and freedoms ;
It's THE SAME Her Majesty who decreed that the Quebec Charter of human rights and freedoms takes precedence over any other act, and that if any doubt arises in the interpretation of such an act, it shall be resolved in respect with the intent of the Charter ;
Through that very Charter, Her Majesty considers that the recognition of women and men's rights constitutes the foundation of justice, liberty and peace ;
Through that very Charter, Her Majesty also considers that those rights are intrinsic - they are yours and no one is authorized to infringe with them ;
Now can you see the non-sense : If the state ever decides to accuse or sue you for trying to have those rights recognized and respected, they'll claim it's Her Majesty who's suing you ;
It seems that one of those rights - the right to the PERSON's SURETY - is the one which protects honest men and women from parasites who use the state and/or the public debt to abuse from them and steal a part of their lives ;
And so it simply seems reasonable to make sure these rights are respected ;
However, it seems that the recognition of those rights is a huge problem for the parasites who use the state and/or the public debt to abuse from honest men and women... Parasites who have yet promised to serve the people and/or to obey Her Majesty's orders and/or to act with honesty.
Without going into the details, here's a few links that may help you understand why and how public debts have been so FRAUDULENT since 1974
- youtu.be/O8Zl1Wax8MI
- youtu.be/CTd1PV4AnDg
- youtu.be/-Aikl8hGn-w
- youtu.be/Q5ND1a2sJAU
- youtu.be/cgdyWPxLf1s
- decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca/fc-cf/decisions/en/item/72554/index.do
- prudentpress.com/finance/history-bank-of-canada
In 1974, my parents most certainly hadn't even yet imagined I could ever exist.
And so that FRAUD started before I even started living.
If the mere fact that coming to life on a territory which is occupied by parasites who decided to exploit and/or abuse and/or steal from honest men and women were to create an OBLIGATION for me to pay for...
- reckless spending which I'm not responsible for and that I do NOT endorse,
- corruption which I'm not responsible for and that I do NOT endorse,
- abuses which I'm not responsible for and that I do NOT endorse,
- violence which I'm not responsible for and that I do NOT endorse, and
- everything else which I'm not responsible for and that I do NOT endorse,
... that would effectively make ME, a SLAVE.
It's not a matter of being altruist or generous...
You see, if generosity has to be enforced with THREATS and/or INTIMIDATION, it no longer is generosity, it's THEFT.
How can anyone MORALLY pretend being entitled to the TIME, ENERGY and KNOWLEDGE ... to the LIFE ... of an other, without his/her consent ???
Haven't SLAVERY and INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE been abolished or outlawed already ???
Accepting that parasites take a part of our lives away, to pay more parasites so that they can take a bigger part of our lives away, to allow more parasites to abuse from us, wouldn't that make us the willful accomplices of our own SLAVERY ?
AND WOULDN'T THAT BE PURE MADNESS ???
The Quebec Charter of human rights and freedoms, which is part of the Quebec constitution, effectively protects honest men and women from slavery and/or involuntary servitude. It is powerful and it seems to be rather disturbing to the parasites from which it was meant to protect us.
When the CRA refuses to recognize it, it is therefor absolutely just and reasonable to demand answers and/or explanations from them.
And because you should all understand what I'm doing and you probably should be doing it too, everything I send to the government and/or their employees and/or agencies is now being published on http://steemit.com/@willbed.
If you haven't yet realized that public debts are IMPOSSIBLE to pay off, it's about time you focus on that reality... Because it's no coincidence and unacceptable that it'd be so.
If you haven't yet realized that it's IMMORAL and WRONG to presume that the responsibility for the public debt can be forwarded to future generations, it's about time you re-think that... Because such a level of disresponsibilisation and recklessness is the basics of what's wrong with the world.
If you haven't yet realized that the only thing which you can be sure of, is that if you keep buying this FRAUD, you'll keep paying until you die, and maybe it's time you re-think the meaning of your life... No other species on Earth would be so stupid that they would abdicate their life without even trying to secure their integrity and their future.
And if you haven't yet realized that accepting to pay for all of this, without asking any question to those who abuse from you, is precisely what allowed to this modern slavery to become such ridiculously normal, maybe it's time you try to see past what your imaginary chains have been limiting you to...
IT'S YOUR ONLY LIFE !
ARE YOU REALLY GOING TO LET PARASITES TAKE IT AWAY FROM YOU ???
The Charter is a powerful tool, which the Quebec from 40something years ago granted to men and women who live here, so that we NEVER become economic slaves...
This Charter is OURS to use to his full power.
«So surely that once rid of our old and frightening incapacity to trust ourselves, we'll quickly realize that in all fields, including economics, as surely there as anywhere else, a people in charge of his own affair, and of it's affairs, moves forward infinitely faster and better than a society deprived of it's true ability to make decisions and of the main instruments of such decisions.»
-- René Lévesque
ADMINISTRATION
[ADRESS]
[ADRESS]
Québec, June 29th, 2017
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED - WITHOUT PREJUDICE
MR BOB HAMILTON - COMMISSIONER OF THE CANADIAN REVENUE AGENCY
CANADA POST REGISTERED MAIL RN048288158CA
7th Floor - 555 MacKenzie Avenue, Ottawa ON K1A0L5
C.C. : EASTERN QUEBEC TAX CENTER
CANADA POST REGISTERED MAIL RN048288189
2251, boul. René-Lévesque, Jonquière QC G7S5J2
C.C. : MRS DIANE LEBOUTHILLIER - MINISTER OF REVENUE - CANADA
CANADA POST REGISTERED MAIL RN048288175CA
7th Floor - 555 MacKenzie Avenue, Ottawa ON K1A0L5
C.C. : MRS JODY WILSON-RAYBOULD - MINISTER OF JUSTICE - CANADA
CANADA POST REGISTERED MAIL RN048288113CA
284, rue Wellington, Ottawa ON K1A0H8
C.C. : J MICHEL DOYON - LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF QUÉBEC
CANADA POST REGISTERED MAIL RN048288144CA
Édifice André-Laurendeau, RC - 1050, rue des Parlementaires, Québec (Québec) G1A1A1
C.C. : HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
CANADA POST REGISTERED MAIL RW933101267CA
Buckingham Palace - London SW1A 1AA
Subject : YOUR NOTICE, DATED JUNE 15th, 2017
INTERPRETATION
The following definitions apply to the current communication :
"I" and/or "ME" : I, THE MAN who has the RIGHT to the PERSON and/or LEGAL ENTITY named [FIRSTNAME LASTNAME]'s SURETY
"my" and/or "mine" : to ME, THE MAN, and NOT to the PERSON and/or LEGAL ENTITY named [FIRSTNAME LASTNAME]
Hello Mister Hamilton,
YOU may NOT already know, but YOU and/or "the canadian revenue agency" (hereafter "the CRA") have sent a NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT dated June 15th, 2017 and addressed to [FIRSTNAME LASTNAME].
By this NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT, YOU and/or the CRA are referring to "YOUR declaration" and "YOUR owing amount". YOU also allege that "YOU must pay...".
TELL ME, isn't "vouvoiement" (addressing someone at the third person of plural) addressing PERSONS and/or doesn't it imply SURETY ?
So before anything, I WISH YOU could explain who and/or what is and/or are "YOU", that "YOU" which YOU are referring to ?
TAKE NOTICE that I, THE MAN, do NOT accept that anyone address ME in any way that could give reasons to anyone to believe that II, THE MAN, could be and/or that I could accept from anyone that they address ME as I was a PERSON and/or LEGAL ENTITY and/or that I could accept to act as SURETY for the PERSON to who's SURETY I already have a FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT to and/or that I could accept to abdicate MY RIGHTS, and more specifically MY RIGHT to not be a SLAVE.
TAKE NOTICE that I, THE MAN, do NOT accept COURTESIES.
Any attempt, by whoever, to pin SURETY on ME, against my will and in CLEAR VIOLATION of my RIGHTS, would effectively be FRAUDULENT and UNACCEPTABLE.
Consequently, YOUR NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT, dated June 15th, 2017 and addressed to [FIRSTNAME LASTNAME], is returned to YOU, CORRECTED and REFUSED, so that YOU do NOT presume that I, THE MAN, could accept that YOU address ME as such.
I also WISH to know, it seems the name [FIRSTNAME LASTNAME] could be the name of the PERSON with the SIN XXX-XXX-XXX. Isn't that CORRECT ?
TELL ME, ISN'T that PERSON the one which I, THE MAN, have a RIGHT to the SURETY of, as per what Her Majesty's decreed in the Quebec Charter of human rights and freedoms, L.R.Q. Chapter C-12 (hereafter "the Charter") ?
UNLESS YOU SEND A WRITTEN AND SIGNED DECLARATION THAT [FIRSTNAME LASTNAME] COULD NOT BE THE NAME OF THE PERSON WHO'S SURETY I, THE MAN, HAVE THE RIGHT TO,
YOU UNDERSTAND that I, THE MAN, have - like it or NOT - a FUNDAMENTAL or INTRINSIC RIGHT to the PERSON named [FIRSTNAME LASTNAME]'s SURETY, who's account number and/or social insurance number is XXX-XXX-XXX and to which YOU seem to have addressed YOUR NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT and/or a PUBLIC DEBT.
IN FACT,
CONSIDERING THAT Her Majesty is the supreme authority to which YOU and/or the CRA must answer to and/or which YOU and/or the CRA must RESPECT, and/or from which any law, including but not limited to those which the CRA may pretend having a mandate and/or authority to enforce, may even exist,
(Ref : http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/C-10.11/FullText.html),
AND CONSIDERING THAT Her Majesty, with the advice and consent of the National Assembly of Québec, enacted that the Carter binds the state
(Ref : http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/C-12, Article 54),
AND CONSIDERING THAT No provision of any Act, even subsequent to the Charter, may derogate from sections 1 to 38, except so far as provided by those sections, unless such Act expressly states that it applies despite the Charter
(Ref : http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/C-12, Article 52),
AND CONSIDERING THAT Every human being has a right to life, and to personal security, inviolability and freedom
AND THAT He also possesses juridical personality
(Ref : http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/C-12, Article 1),
AND CONSIDERING THAT Whereas respect for the dignity of human beings, equality of women and men, and recognition of their rights and freedoms constitute the foundation of justice, liberty and peace
(Ref : http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/C-12, Préambule),
AND CONSIDERING THAT If any doubt arises in the interpretation of a provision of the Act, it shall be resolved in keeping with the intent of the Charter.
(Ref : http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/en/showdoc/cs/C-12, Article 53),
AND CONSIDERING THAT the Charter of human rights and freedoms (thereafter "the Charter") is a quasi-constitutional law,
AND CONSIDERING THAT LEGAL documents are based on the LEGAL definition of the words used,
AND CONSIDERING THAT LEGALLY, a SURETY is : "An individual who undertakes an obligation to pay a sum of money or to perform some duty or promise for another in the event that person fails to act."
(Ref : http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/surety),
AND BECAUSE the CRA has already received, through many CANADA POST REGISTERED MAIL communications, clear questions,
to which the CRA has so far neglected and/or omitted and/or refused to provide the answers to, which it MUST, like it or not, PROVIDE
regarding its recognition and/or iots respect of the RIGHT to the PERSON's SURETY,
recognition of which, like it or not, must constitute the foundation of JUSTICE, LIBERTY and PEACE,
It seems reasonable to believe that the CRA KNOWS VERY WELL ALREADY that I, THE MAN, WISH that YOU and/or the CRA RECOGNIZE AND RESPECT my RIGHT to the PERSON's SURETY, has decreed by by Her Majesty, with the advice and consent of the National Assembly of Quebec, in the charter.
EVERYONE MUST OBEY THE LAW, is that NOT TRUE ?
THE STATE MUST OBEY THE LAW, is that NOT TRUE ?
Because if the nstate didn't have to obey the law, there wouldn't be no law, is that NOT TRUE ? But ONLY A FRAUD, is that NOT TRUE ?
And THAT would be UNACCEPTABLE, is that NOT TRUE ?
INDEED, like it or not, the law begins with an obligation for the state to recognize the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS of MEN and WOMEN - else it would be SLAVERY and/or INVOLUNTARY SERVITUDE and THAT would be UNACCEPTABLE.
SO MAKE SURE YOU OBEY THE LAW AND RECOGNIZE AND RESPECT MY RIGHTS.
AS YOU most certainly can confirm, the PERSON to who's SURETY I, THE MAN, have a FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT's tax return forms have always been produced, as per that PERSON's LEGAL OBLIGATIONS, is that NOT TRUE ?
And since this is a question which has ALREADY been addressed to the CRA
but the CRA has so far neglected and/or omitted and/or refused to answer,
I WISH YOU TELL ME :
Is a PERSON domiciled in Quebec under ANY OBLIGATION to have a TAXPAYER title in Canada ?
YES or NO ?
NOW, by YOUR NOTICE OF ASSESSMENT dated June 15th, 2017, you seem to pretend that an amount of $XX XXX,XX could be owed by "YOU" and/or "[FIRSTNAME LASTNAME]"
TELL ME, is it TRUE ?
And if that were to be TRUE, TELL ME :
WHY would the SURETY - to which I, THE MAN, have a FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT - of the PERSON named [FIRSTNAME LASTNAME] would NOT have yet done, with the part of that amount which, based on what YOU seem to pretend, would have been owed for well over a year, would NOT have done what a SURETY MUST LEGALLY DO, as I WISHED it would do AND as I DEMANDED it would do ?
TELL ME, doesn't the CRA ABIDE by the Financial Administration Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. F-11) and/or doesn't the CRA ABIDE by the Bills of Exchange Act (R.S.C., 1985, c. B-4) ?
PRESUMING THAT, as YOU seem to pretend, any amount could be owed ;
AND
PRESUMING THAT a PERSON domiciled in Quebec would be under the OBLIGATION to have a TAXPAYER title in Canada
AND
CONSIDERING THAT the Charter is a quasi-constitutional and/or FUNDAMENTAL law ;
AND
CONSIDERING THAT LEGAL documents Re based on the LEGAL definitions of words used
AND
CONSIDERING THAT LEGALLY, a SURETY is
«An individual who undertakes an obligation to pay a sum of money or to perform some duty or promise for another in the event that person fails to act.»,
AND
CONSIDERING THAT I, THE MAN have a RIGHT, as decreed by Her Majesty at article 1 of the Charter, to my PERSON's SURETY
AND
CONSIDERING THAT IT'S A RIGHT THAT HAS, as states at section 52 of the Charter, precedence over any otfher act;
AND
CONSIDERING THAT, as CONSIDERED in the Charter's preamble, the RECOGNITION of this RIGHT must CONSTITUTE the FOUNDATION of JUSTICE, LIBERTYT and PEACE ;
I WISH TO KNOW
MAY this SURETY, to which I, THE MAN, HAVE A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT which takes precedence over any other act and/or code and/or statute and who's RECOGNITION must constitute the FOUNDATION of JUSTICE, LIBERTY and PEACE, do, with public debts addressed by the CRA to the PERSON named [FIRSTNAME LASTNAME] (which has the account and/or social insurance number XXX-XXX-XXX), what a SURETY MAY LEGALLY do ?
YES or NO ?
If that SURETY can EFFECTIVELY do, with public debts that YOU and/or the CRA may address to that PERSON, what a SURETY MUST LEGALLY do,
I'd WISH that
EITHER YOU disclose, by a WRITTEN and SIGNED declaration, the complete, clear and precise method which is RECOGNIZED and ACCEPTED by YOU and/or the CRA so that this SURETY can do, with public debts addressed to that PERSON by the CRA, what a SURETY MUST LEGALLY do;
OR
EITHER a PERSON or an ORGANIZATION or a MANDATED AGENT or a SOVEREIGN disclose, by a WRITTEN and SIGNED declaration, the complete, clear and precise method which is RECOGNIZED and ACCEPTED by YOU and/or the CRA so that this SURETY can do, with public debts addressed to that PERSON by the CRA, what a SURETY MUST LEGALLY do;
OR
EITHER YOU take all necessary and/or required actions for this SURETY to do, with public debts addressed to that PERSON by the CRA, what a SURETY MUST LEGALLY do AND that YOU send a WRITTEN and SIGNED confirmation that this SURETY has EFFECTIVELY done, with any debt that the CRA could be claiming to that PERSON, what a SURETY MUST LEGALLY do.
And if that SURETY could NOT do, with public debts which YOU and/or the CRA may address to that PERSON, what a SURETY MUST LEGALLY do,
I'd WISH that
EITHER be declared, by a WRITTEN and SIGNED declaration, that this SURETY could NOT do what a SURETY MUST LEGALLY do ;
OR
EITHER be declared, by a WRITTEN and SIGNED declaration, that the CRA does NOT ACCEPT that this SURETY do what a SURETY MUST LEGALLY do ;
OR
EITHER be declared, by a WRITTEN and SIGNED declaration, that the CRA does NOT RECOGNIZE my RIGHT to the PERSON's SURETY ;
OR
EITHER be declared, by a WRITTEN and SIGNED declaration, that the CRA does NOT RESPECT my RIGHT to the PERSON's SURETY ;
OR
EITHER be declared, by a WRITTEN and SIGNED declaration, that it's NOT TRUE that I, THE MAN, have the RIGHT to that SURETY ;
OR
EITHER be declared, by a WRITTEN and SIGNED declaration, that this SURETY does NOT exist ;
OR
EITHER be declared, by a WRITTEN and SIGNED declaration, that I, THE MAN, am in fact a SLAVE.
And if I, THE MAN were to be declared a SLAVE, I'd obviously WISH that it be declared, by a WRITTEN and SIGNED declaration, precisely and clearly WHO and/or WHAT would I, THE MAN be a SLAVE of ?
UNDERSTAND THAT, in good faith, I WISH that any confusion and/or controversy be avoided in regards to MY RIGHTS and the RECOGNITION and RESPECT of those RIGHTS
AND
UNDERSTAND THAT all answers which are required from YOU are, indeed awaited.
I WISH that YOU don't ignore and that YOU don't neglect the importance of RECOGNIZING and RESPECTING my FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS, the RECOGNITION of which must constitute the FOUNDATION of JUSTICE, LIBERTY and PEACE
AND
I WISH that all REQUIRED and AWAITED answers to all the questions which have been addressed to YOU and/or the CRA be transmitted, in WRITING, within ten (10) days.
INDEED, whether YOU like it or NOT, the Charter COMPELS YOU to RECOGNIZE my RIGHTS.
And whether YOU like it or NOT, the Charter CONSIDERS that YOUR failure to RECOGNIZE my RIGHTS would mean that JUSTICE, LIBERTY and PEACE would NOT EXIST.
IN THIS REGARD,
If JUSTICE were to NOT EXIST, I'd DEMAND YOU declare so, by a WRITTEN and SIGNED declaration, within ten (10) days.
If LIBERTY were to NOT EXIST, I'd DEMAND YOU declare so, by a WRITTEN and SIGNED declaration, within ten (10) days.
If PEACE were to NOT EXIST, I'd DEMAND YOU declare so, by a WRITTEN and SIGNED declaration, within ten (10) days.
AND TAKE NOTICE that damages caused by each violation of any of my FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS are valued at $2 000 000.00.
I also WISH to remind YOU that if I and/or anyone ever gave you reasons to believe that I, THE MAN could be an "employee" and/or an "agent" and/or an "officer" and/or "Her Majesty" and/or an "organization" and/or the PERSON named [FIRSTNAME LASTNAME] and/or a LEGAL ENTITY and/or a slave, that would be a MISTAKE and please forgive ME.
Also, if I and/or anyone ever gave you reasons to believe that I could be SURETY for public debts that YOU could address to the "PERSON named [FIRSTNAME LASTNAME]", that would be a MISTAKE and please forgive ME.
I also WISH to remind YOU that I WISH that YOU do NOT address ME using the title "Mister", I am NOT anyone's "Mister", I am NOT your subordinate, I am NOT an agent of the state and/or of Her Majesty,
And I WISH that YOU do NOT address ME using "vous" (vouvoiement / plural), as I am NOT plural, I am NOT an organization, I am NOT the PERSON named [FIRSTNAME LASTNAME] and I am NOT SURETY for that PERSON.
Should you chose to use "vous" in any future communication, I DEMAND that YOU'd specify WHO would YOU be addressing as such : Would it be I, THE MAN, or the PERSON who's SURETY I have a RIGHT to ?
nd if YOU were to pretend that YOU could be addressing ME as such, I'd WISH to know by which authority would you try to attribute the PERSONALITY to ME, in FRAUD of my RIGHTS, or to force SURETY on ME regarding YOUR public debts ?
I WISH that no one address ME using ANY NAME derived from ANY PUBLIC DOCUMENT. YOU can use "tu" (tutoiement / singular) and/or "Will" and/or “Sole Authorized Administrator" when talking to ME. NOTHING ELSE.
YOU certainly UNDERSTAND that if anyone were to try and make me give anyone else reasons to believe ME could be a PERSON and/or a LEGAL ENTITY and/or SURETY in that matter, this would seem like bad faith and/or deceit and/or conspiration and/or VIOLATION of my RIGHTS.
And so it obviously is VERY IMPORTANT to avoid any presumption and/or confusion regarding that.
Respectfully, and thanking YOU for paying attention to the importance for YOU to answer the questions and demands which have been addressed to the CRA regarding YOUR RECOGNITION and YOUR RESPECT of MY RIGHTS.
By : _ _ _ _ _ [scribble] _ _ _ _ _
Sole Authorized Administrator for the PERSON and/or LEGAL ENTITY named [FIRSTNAME LASTNAME] with the inscription number 119XX04XXXXXX and with the account number XXX-XXX-XXX
ALL RIGHTS RESERVED