I agree with you, @smooth. A very easy way to not have this problem, yet still allow users to support them, would be to make the support opt-in rather than opt-out, so you would need to actively click on something to agree to support them.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Or just use the ability in a more moderate manner. It isn't necessary to attempt to pull $10000 from the system "because steemian T&C"
Curating for max rewards, and not max 'good' content, is reward pool rape, in our opinion.
What happened to the 80mv whale experiment?
How about a sigmoid reward curve that discourages large holdings while encouraging small ones?
Seems that would encourage adoption as a currency, and not as a parking spot to rape the reward pool for roi, only to dump at a high.