It's a dilemma for me :) - Why to make a sequel or a prequel just for the sake of making a sequel or a prequel? For a few quick bucks? Well, it may work for once, but enough is enough, it's never a good feeling :) I know it's not a "good" comparison, but Kubrick made "2001:A Space Odyssey" 50 years ago, it's been five decades, and it still shines with its genius. We still talk about it. Not that I expect a "Kubrick quality" from these "cheesy" movies (are these even "movies"?), but, come on dear "movie" producers, I think we deserve much better than this. :) - I wonder, who will talk about this so-called movie in April 2018 :)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I doubt anyone will be talking about this after too long. I hope they can see where they are going wrong and concentrate on a "proper" sequel to the original next time. Though, as you say, is it really even needed?
Have you seen "The Man From Earth: Holocene"? The first movie, "The Man From Earth" was a masterpiece, and the sequel was, you know the rest of the story :) A Disaster! :)