Balance is a very important word in nature.
As you may remember from Sir Isaac Newton's gravitational law, every object of mass exerts a force on every other object of mass that is close to it. With all these forces of attraction all over the place, it seems sensible to expect objects to be in constant motion in response to these forces, right? While discussing with a friend of mine, the concept of unbalanced forces kept coming up aboutNewton's First Law of Motion. In case you don't remember, that law states:
Balanced and Unbalanced Forces
An easy way to visualise balanced forces is to think of children playing thug-of-war. The idea is to see which team would produce a greater force. Initially, when both teams begin to pull on each other, the two teams are in equilibrium meaning that the force both sides are equal and opposite. Equal but opposite forces are balanced forces. If however, the force on one end becomes greater than the force on the other end, the team producing the less force would have to move in the direction of the team that produced the greater force. Therefore, the weaker team would move in the direction of the net force and the force in this system is said to be unbalanced. According to Newton's first law, an unbalanced force must produce an acceleration. In the image to the right, an unbalanced force could exist if the man was standing in quicksand. The reason that a man standing on quicksand would sink is that the force of gravity does not have any sense whatsoever. That force has no idea that the man thought he was standing on sand and expects not to sink. No, the force of gravity is the same whether the man stands on a concrete floor or a quicksand. In the case of the man standing on quicksand, the force of gravity will remain constant and thus sink the man until he reaches a stronger surface that is capable of producing enough force to counter the force of gravity. Of course, this is why houses must be built on solid ground with good foundations.
Building Structures and Translational Equilibrium
Structures are built to serve different purposes, ranging from buildings that are constructed to protect people and their properties from outside environmental conditions to bridges that are built to support vehicles and people. In each case, the structure must be strong enough to carry its weight and external forces that it must bear when it is in use or due to natural disasters such as earthquake, flood or wind. An understanding of the forces which such buildings must resist without causing deformity of the structure is key to determining the strength of the materials to be used in construction and other design considerations.
As I discussed in the above picture, the acceleration of a body in uniform motion or at rest is zero because no net external force is acting on it. When a body satisfies this condition, the body is said to be in Translational Equilibrium. In the case of a building or a bridge, for the structures to be in translational equilibrium, the load or forces acting on the structures must be balanced by the reaction forces at the foundations and supports. In the image shown to the left, it can be seen that the forces which act on a body are not always vertical or horizontal. The forces usually act at an angle and must, therefore, be resolved into their vertical and horizontal components to analyse the effect of each of these forces properly. In the case of the body shown, representing the reaction force of the plane into the horizontal and vertical components, resolving the force, F into vertical and horizontal components, adding the three forces and equating them to zero would enable us find the value of the force, F, which is necessary to maintain the translational equilibrium of the body.
As shown in the calculation, the force, F must be at least 50N or else the body would slide right downwards. An exact force of 50N would ensure translational equilibrium. However, if the force exceeds 50N, the body would slide up in the direction of F. In other words, if translational equilibrium were not satisfied, the structure would fail and therefore accelerate in the direction of the net force. Because gravity is constant, this acceleration is usually in the direction of acceleration due to gravity.
How Gravity Works Against Structures
Some of the fears of builders and architects include:
- fears that the whole building might gradually sink into the ground (much like a man standing on a quicksand). To solve this problems, buildings (especially tall ones) are erected on solid, compressed ground or rocks.
- fears that the building may not stand upright (that is, that the building might be inclined at an angle other than right angles). This is the case for the Leaning Tower of Pisa.
- there is also fear that the building may collapse under its weight due to tension and compression forces.
Underlying each of these points of failure in a building structure is the action of gravity on structures. Ordinarily, the force of gravity acts straight down such that a building that can carry its weight should not fall. However, the weight of any structure is known to be concentrated in the middle of the structure, called centre of mass. For an upright structure, the centre of mass is in the middle, but if the structure is tilted to one side, the centre of mass shifts away from the centre and the force of gravity can have a turning effect. This turning effect is called a moment that is capable of making the structure to topple over.
To reinforce the Leaning Tower, some modifications were made on the building a couple of decades ago when lead counterweights were added at the base to keep the building stable. Now, after ensuring that a building does not topple over by erecting it upright, the builder must provide that the building can carry its weight.
Weight Support in Buildings
To ensure that buildings do not collapse under their weight, the foundations are made of stronger, heavier materials that the stories. An effective way of doing this is through the use of steel pillars and reinforced concrete. Also, lightweight materials such as cardboard and fibres are used in the interior of the building where strength is not required to ensure that the building does not carry more load than is required.
Conclusion
Apart from toppling over due to the moment of force of gravity, buildings also have to cope with tension and compression. That's not all: building must carry another load apart from the weight of the materials used to erect the building. The tallest skyscraper must house people, furniture, office equipment, generators and even a helipad. The simplest bridge must carry motor vehicles, human beings and animals. This means that every static structure also has to cope with varying loads. Working out the maximum size of these loads and the strength of materials that can be used in a particular design to provide greater resistance to the inevitable load are crucial parts of the design process.
Finally
What do you think may be the possible forces at work in the Leaning Tower and why hasn't the damn thing toppled over?
References
- Wikipedia | The Leaning Tower of Pisa
- The Slideplayer | Rotational Force
- Explain That Stuff | How Buildings Work
- Jaconline | Design Changes
- The Physics Classroom | Balanced and Unbalanced Forces
If you write STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) related posts, consider joining #steemSTEM on discord here. If you are from Nigeria, you may want to include the #stemng tag in your post. You can visit this blog by @stemng for more details. You can also check this blog post by @steemstem here and this guidelines here for help on how to be a member of @steemstem. Please also check this blog post from @steemstem on proper use of images devoid of copyright issues here.
Until 80 years later in 1360 rebuilding and at the stage of construction in the wake of a room located at the top of the Tower of Pisa.
Due to the unstable soil conditions and this is so whatever the efforts of the Tower of Pisa will remain oblique. Currently there is still information about the Tower of Pisa that can still be done, such as the support Tower of Pisa which previously used a conglomerate stone do 150 with a beam of concrete that can be resisted using steel cable.
Then around in 1999 made a final improvement to stabilize the tower building by doing the excavation and removal of land under the foundation of the Tower of Pisa in hopes of lowering its slope. Investigate some words from some experts, the Tower of Pisa will be able to survive until three to three centuries again.
You are right. There have been these improvements. I am glad to hear from you as usual. Your knowledge is quite extensive.
The tower of pisa looks like a bent palm tree with the way it is. I guess the engineers looked at that before constructing the tower. I hope to visit the place myself.
Thanks for showing your engineering side churchboy.
Keep steeming!
Thanks for the comment. The slant was not intentional. The ground on which it was built was a bit too soft to hold the weight so it sank on one side more than the other.
You're appreciated.
Being A SteemStem Member
Well I'll start by attempting the last question and I'd say that the tower has not flip and fall under its weight because the building has been reinforced to counter the moments of forces trying to flip it over in the first place but if the building receives enough force at its top it could still surrender to the resulting moment
I suppose you are right. I am sure special care is taken to ensure that this does not happen. It is good to see you here, bro.
This is EGR 101.
I am interested to know what EGR 101 is :)
Me too, very imterested.
You have entered. Please tell us oh :)
That's Engineering 101.
More like a basic course for would-be engineers. Lol
So true.
The leaning tower gets me thinking a lot.
Thanks for being here. I hope you are having fun.
Hey @churchboy, well done on the good post and upvote, it was deserved.
You have a lot of experience on steemit now I can see, have you thought about leaving feedback on newbies posts to help them develop, don't forget to check other users stem articles also :)
You're right. I hadn't thought about my experience at all. I guess it is easy to take those things for granted. I do give feedback to other writers. However, since you requested it, I will do more :)
Thank you.