Personally, I think that unused votes are a bigger threat to steem's value than voting bots. It's demoralizing to authors who spend the time it takes to produce a quality article and go without recognition just because no one happens to see their article. I wrote about this here.
Granted, there are better ways to recognize quality than a simple author list, but it's a starting point. It'sort-of like sponsorships for athletes. They're still sponsored even when they deliver the occasional weak performance. If we pick our author lists carefully, I think it's good for steem and steemit. Future bots will be better, of course.
Thank you for your reply and the valid opinion. Yes, future automated ways might be better.
One drawback with automated voting, if you overdo it, is constantly low voting power.