Hey everyone involved in the @steemstem project.
I'm sorry to hear that people were complaining about getting no upvote, or even a too small upvote. I don't get those guys, and it's very sad to hear that ungrateful people like that are stealing so much time from you. My opinion is that the author should be grateful for every single upvote, no matter how big or how small, but I guess some people get blinded by greed when posting here on the Steem blockchain.
I just wanted to say thank you guys for all your hard work. I'm very grateful for all the upvotes and comments you guys have left on my posts! And I'm really thankful for all the hard work you are doing by attracting more STEM authors to Steemit.
I hope that you guys are feeling better after a small break, and it seems like it's surely needed at this point.
The only suggestion I have for solving the issue would be to just stop letting people ask for reasoning why they did not get an upvote. Just have a strict "all votes are final, and no reason will be given for the %" policy or something like that, and not spend a lot of time telling people why they didn't get an upvote.
It's not the only problem. We are also sad to see, that the community almost solely relies on steemstem giving out votes, but doesn't support each other with votes, comments, advice, and encouragement. That's a great flaw which has bothered us for a while.
But we will find a way to improve that, I'm positive.
Hmm, building an engaged community is really something that is difficult, so it's going to be more complex to figure out a solution for this problem.
One idea I have that might work to some extent could be to release a SteemSTEM SMT (once Steemit Inc. releases SMTs), where you could allow give the SteemSTEM posters the ability to hand out tokens to comments that contribute to the original post. This way people will be encouraged to actually engage in discussions and contribute with additional information in the comments.
There are probably a lot of flaws with the idea, but it was just something that popped into my head when I was reading your comment.
This idea is on the list, but as said by suesa, this will take time. Most probably mid or long term. For the short terms ideas, in an hour or so ^^
Yeah, it seems like SMTs are taking a lot longer for the Steemit Inc. team to develop than they had anticipated. But it will be exciting to see how you guys plan on using them once they are finally released. I think they can have a big impact on a community like SteemSTEM if used properly!
We have plenty of ideas, but without the SMTs really there, it is actually hard to get what is realistic and what is not. Anyways, we are staying tuned ^^
We've been planning to use SMTs since they were announced, but there's no sign yet that they might be available soon. And until they are, we need to find a different way to carry on, because it can't go on like it has. :/
I see why you are skeptical that SMTs will arrive anytime soon. They have been postponed many times already, so it's not really a certainty that we will get them anytime soon anymore..
I have a question... is there an rough idea around how much of the lack of votes and comments is difficulty in finding content vs people not wanting to engage? To find a good solution requires understanding the problem space. Maybe that is why there has been little movement in the development?
We will address this :)
Maybe. I'll keep your suggestion in mind, yes, we might need to make content more available.