You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: About my own research: gluons, gluinos and sgluons are not weird creatures from Harry Potter

in #steemstem6 years ago

Electricity comes from the motion of electric charges. The corresponding fundamental interactions behind this phenomenon is electromagnetism that is modeled, at the most fundamental level, by photon exchanges between charges particles. We can correspondingly assume a graviton exchange for modeling gravity at the most fundamental level. However, the formalism does not work. Which is why the embedding of gravity in elementary physics consists in one of the present challenges.

Sort:  

allow me to be the layman for once and ever

do gravitons exist

i mean have they been confirmed, observed and detected ?

has anyone "seen" them ?

i know i have obnoxious questions but ... its a bit what i do , like me

is there any proof of a "graviton" as such ? or are they just part of the mathematical model ?

Gravitons have never been observed. They may or may not exist.

o dear ...

sayonara-zetsubou-sensei-nozomu-itoshiki-teacher-japanese-manga.jpg

the universe DOES really hang by a theoretical thread doesn't it :)

(sayonara zetsubou sensei picture one of my alltime favourite anime)

so if gravitons don't exist the whole model is ... is wrong again ? which makes me assume you're hunting gravitons too at lhc ?

i mean ... its basically "what makes the world turn"

Gravity is not included in the Standard Model, because we don't know how to do it. This consists in an entire field of research. There are several propositions, and those are currently being tested.

i see, so it's a "force" , not yet a particle/building block then ....

Gravity is a force, and it is assumed to be mediated by the graviton. However, we have not observed any of these (and it is not clear we will never be able to).

uh huh ... look like you've been busy ...

saves me the trouble of apologizing for a late reply since i havent for several days now ... so this graviton particle (is a particle? theoretically speaking?) is responsible for "the weak force" but it only exists in theory and even then it is not part of the standard model ? so where do you place it ? you have a 3d matrix of sorts to put these kind of elusive little buggers in ? in a sheet next to the standard model, well in another row or page so to speak ?

I wouldnt say never ... people would never fly and basically if you think about it if efforts were combined and a decent space station would be built (i'm not even speaking about an actual space elevator , it would be completely possible to have a hangar in orbit where ships could be built, or at least for the first stage kept so they don't need to use massive amounts of resources to escape the gravity well , in which way a supply line of sorts could be set up because ship starting from there would need only a little push to get started, which could be a supply line to the moon, or to mars or actually to the gas mines of further planets , all of that is technically possible RIGHT NOW, but its not being done, for political reasons and because competitive psychopaths at high levels need to "win" instead of advance, so seeing all that i wouldnt say never to the discovery of said graviton in our, your or my lifetime ... there's no reason why not, right ? only politics :)