report has it as a quarter of the total emission. The discussion is one that I like, and I would like for me to be wrong. Good article anyways.I had some reservation, just like @kryzsec at the high percentage you quoted, but I think you made a convincing argument, but the truth is I do not feel that it is that high. We all love to have a better environment but saying non-vegan activities contribute to such a high percentage of greenhouse gas emission is pretty alarming or should I say not-so-accurate. While we have electricity, transportation, who are the major contributors to greenhouse gas emission, sharing a miserly 50% with other sectors. This
Note
1: I saw some links that state that it is as high as 50%, but none has any credible data/source to back it up.
2: Do not take any contrary opinion as a slight on your person or someone challenging your authority/expertise on a subject. That is why every genuine article is reviewed by peers before it can be taken as a verified scientific work.
I am all for a greener planet. Peace.
I do appreciate your comment @greenrun .
Your note is well noted by me.
I cant say the statistics given is wrong but i would agree it's not so accurate.
At least i might not be perfect. That's why at all point science has to be verified to be widely accepted. I did enjoy the opinion of @kryzsec and yours.
At least i have learned something from this.
Cheers.