You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: NATURE INSPIRED INVENTIONS --- LED bulbs; and those little fireflies lit up the world as I fell asleep.

in #steemstem6 years ago

nature won't cease to amaze us

Change that to:
God's creation, AKA "nature" won't cease to amaze us once we accepted that "nature" was the "intelligent design" of God and nothing happened by "accident.

Sort:  

I can see that you a religion fanatic, please endeavor that in my subsequent posts that any comment you will make on any of them should be related to the subject matter, or else, I will be forced to consider it a spam. Thanks.

religion fanatic

No, I am not - it is point - counterpoint.

please endeavor that in my subsequent posts that any comment you will make on any of them should be related to subject matter

I am on topic - not spam of any kind

or else, I will be forced to consider it a spam

It is a free country and I consider this as a "get lost" threat and therefore, I'll put you on mute to be safe from it.

"free speech" and criticism is not welcome here.

see ya (no I won't) ...

Am sorry. But I can't help but wonder why you took time to read the post, only to detect "faults" without even taking a moment to upvote the post and you are wondering why I won't consider it a spam?
Am sorry if my thoughts came out wrongly, but I hope you understand one day. It was nice meeting you.

The author wrote the article how he thought it was relevant.
You can't pressure the author to change his article, it's the basics of freedom of speech. This constitutes a form of abuse in my view.

freedom of speech is tolerance of offensive speech.
How was I abusive?
How was I even offensive?
I made one point: give credit where credit is due. How is that abusive? Please quote my words.
and, calling me

religion fanatic

is not offensive? wow!

You demanded him to change "his" article. I didn't see any "please" there. It was demanding.
And no, freedom of speech is not the tolerance of the untolerant. This is just abuse. Freedom of speech is the freedom of saying your own ideas, not to demand others change theirs. There's a huge difference and if you haven't noticed it yet, I suggest you reread your initial statement.

and, for that, I am putting you on mute as well for being abusive - your words.

Honest human of science and logic. ... Knowledge seeker.

ha!

Muting me is just like putting your head in the sand, like an ostrich. The problem doesn't go away, but from your POV, you don't see anything, therefore it's solved :)
Terrible way to handle an argument, dear Sir.

Change that to: God's creation

meaning - change it to read: "God's creation won't cease to amaze us"

[conditional:] once we accepted that "nature" was the "intelligent design" of God ...

It is a suggestion for any reader to consider including the author and there is no word to force anyone to do anything.

AND, IF ANYONE reads this and find offensive or abusive, then, it is PURELY YOUR IMAGINATION!