The author wrote the article how he thought it was relevant.
You can't pressure the author to change his article, it's the basics of freedom of speech. This constitutes a form of abuse in my view.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The author wrote the article how he thought it was relevant.
You can't pressure the author to change his article, it's the basics of freedom of speech. This constitutes a form of abuse in my view.
freedom of speech is tolerance of offensive speech.
How was I abusive?
How was I even offensive?
I made one point: give credit where credit is due. How is that abusive? Please quote my words.
and, calling me
is not offensive? wow!
You demanded him to change "his" article. I didn't see any "please" there. It was demanding.
And no, freedom of speech is not the tolerance of the untolerant. This is just abuse. Freedom of speech is the freedom of saying your own ideas, not to demand others change theirs. There's a huge difference and if you haven't noticed it yet, I suggest you reread your initial statement.
and, for that, I am putting you on mute as well for being
abusive- your words.ha!
Muting me is just like putting your head in the sand, like an ostrich. The problem doesn't go away, but from your POV, you don't see anything, therefore it's solved :)
Terrible way to handle an argument, dear Sir.