You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Introducing SteemPoll, autonomous and decentralized crowd decision making...

in #steempoll8 years ago (edited)

Thank you @clayop for feedback!
Currently, I am working on different filters (results can be filtered by reputation, stake) so outcome can easily be viewed with different demographics. Dividing in 90-99% percentage range might work but it is still same problem. Bot voting is random depending on their algorithm 1% to 100%. Filtering can help to some extend though.
Do you think of any other ways without compromising simplicity and mass participation?
I will make a post later with some of my thoughts on further improvement of SteemPoll.

Sort:  

Filter is good idea... but it still cannot secure anonymous vote. How about using steempower's messaging system?

I can implement custom_json structure like many have suggested, there is one downside though, you will have to use http://steempoll.net only, cannot cast vote from steemit.com/busy.org/esteem/etc. Would that be optimal?

I think it's little inconvenient now but will be resolved soon once Steemit launches Steem Login.

yes, you are right. For now, steemconnect/steem.js works great and I can work on some changes. I am putting my thought on SteemPoll development update post, later today I will post it with some exciting future plans. Please give your feedback if you can, once it is posted! Thanks.