Feedback: A way to divide answers should be modified to remove biases from bots and curation purposes. Many bots will vote for it at higher voting power to get more curation rewards. So why don't you divide it only with the last digit? (e.g. option 1 is 91% and option 9 is 99%)
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thank you @clayop for feedback!
Currently, I am working on different filters (results can be filtered by reputation, stake) so outcome can easily be viewed with different demographics. Dividing in 90-99% percentage range might work but it is still same problem. Bot voting is random depending on their algorithm 1% to 100%. Filtering can help to some extend though.
Do you think of any other ways without compromising simplicity and mass participation?
I will make a post later with some of my thoughts on further improvement of SteemPoll.
Filter is good idea... but it still cannot secure anonymous vote. How about using steempower's messaging system?
I can implement
custom_jsonstructure like many have suggested, there is one downside though, you will have to use http://steempoll.net only, cannot cast vote from steemit.com/busy.org/esteem/etc. Would that be optimal?I think it's little inconvenient now but will be resolved soon once Steemit launches Steem Login.
yes, you are right. For now, steemconnect/steem.js works great and I can work on some changes. I am putting my thought on SteemPoll development update post, later today I will post it with some exciting future plans. Please give your feedback if you can, once it is posted! Thanks.