I assume you regard using force against force as a negation instead of an aggression. Else there won't be any good guys left as the only thing capable of stopping an aggression is an equal force.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I assume you regard using force against force as a negation instead of an aggression. Else there won't be any good guys left as the only thing capable of stopping an aggression is an equal force.
Which is why I don't ever refer to the right to exclude others from one's property by force as the ZAP.