Seriously. Roger and I don't agree on everything, but did you even notice what got him so triggered? It took a great deal to push him over that edge. Good job of the "interviewer" trolling him both before, during and after the "interview"/"debate".
No he shouldn't have done it. But the arrogance on the other side was no less.
All I can say is that Roger gave us a very clear glimpse into his deeper character. Enough that I never want anything to do with Roger or Bcash.
He has a temper, sure. Maybe legit anger issues even. I've seen much worse though and again don't forget about the interviewer, that guy obviously is not a good guy. Same goes for someone like Richard Heart etc etc.
For all the shit that people give Roger, he has taken a lot of it especially these last few years without any outburst what so ever. Still, I'm not here to always defend him, but lets be fair to all participants in the debate. Give shit based on merit if their is shit to be handed out.