I've nothing against sincere voting, but when it comes in a flood like this I have to suspect there's automation involved.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I've nothing against sincere voting, but when it comes in a flood like this I have to suspect there's automation involved.
Regardless, I think the decision to do so comes from the same faulty logic: They think the best way to have the most impact is to make many infinitesimal upvotes. If you want to use automation then you can pick people who consistently do well and allocate a larger percent to them.
it is, they come at exactly the same time, which also pushes away real curators