The "bad whales" rhetoric is harmful. If there is specific behavior that is "bad" then please specify it and explain why. This applies equally (in fact more so since he has greater influence) to @dantheman and others.
The "bad whales" rhetoric is harmful. If there is specific behavior that is "bad" then please specify it and explain why. This applies equally (in fact more so since he has greater influence) to @dantheman and others.
This post was not about "bad whales"... that is subjective and it will always be subjective unless there is a set of specified rules of what large holders should and should not do, that is why I quoted @onceuponatime post about "flagging etiqute"...
On the contrary, my post was trying to bring attention to the fact that limiting whales power will diminish the core value proposition of the steem token.
Of course it wasn't "about" bad whales but it featured the term prominently and many of the comments have continued to use it without defining what they mean. My comment was as much a response to other comments as to the original post. Sorry if that wasn't clear.
Hi @smooth, i know that @dantheman is not a bad whale, infact i think he is doing a awesome work with steemit, but even he can make a mistake and become a bad whale, here the reason why i told this.