Big problem,
as good content doesn't get voted up.
I am looking forward to Dan Larimer's new products. I hope that he learned from the mistakes made with Steemit and will provide something more efficient, fair and without all the horseshit.
Not enough people curate by hand
7 years ago in #steemit by shla-rafia (68)
$3.00
- Past Payouts $3.00
- - Author $2.72
- - Curators $0.27
18 votes
- chhaylin: $0.88
- roelandp: $0.82
- ericvancewalton: $0.63
- lovejoy: $0.21
- norbu: $0.13
- simon.braki.love: $0.11
- b52tailgunner: $0.09
- dreamzchm: $0.04
- kooshikoo: $0.04
- vonnaputra: $0.02
- profitgenerator: $0.01
- saflia: $0.01
- maxpayne5: $0.00
- harvz: $0.00
- game-guru066: $0.00
- socrates1997: $0.00
- dansellcai: $0.00
- leojorgett: $0.00
I am still new to steemit, but I was starting to suspect this. It seems like people are doing a lot of automated activity and it's lowering visibility for the real content.
It limits growth in user numbers. The people who have a lot don't care about growth as they already have more money as they need for a compfortbale life.
I am hoping for a better of steemit as well as any new platform that comes out. I support people who appreciate quality contents and intention. Authentic stuff should always get recognition and that small token of appreciation helps in motivating one to create more quality content.
Exactly