You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: There's more in life to talk about on Steemit than Steemit

in #steemit8 years ago (edited)

I agree that content diversity is something we all should support with our votes (and contributions) since it will be key for mass appeal. And Steemit will require mass adoption to be viable long-term and to justify current market cap.
At the same time, I guess it´s normal that Steemit itself is the main topic in this very early phase of the platform. And I would even go so far to say that it is actually needed (at this stage) to have a large proportion of Steemit-centric posts in order to foster the discussions in this community on what Steemit is about, what it should be about, how it actually works, what changes need to be implemented, how it can grow in the best way, et cetera.
Thanks for bringing up this important topic.

Sort:  

I don't think so. I think that's been covered to death. I waited a few weeks to write this post. I'm still seeing the same stuff over and over. We've had a few big names come through here - including a playmate. Even a writeup in Vice. Yet we aren't seeing a flood of "normal" people AFAIK or if we are they are seeing it's not for them and leaving. We don't want that.

The sooner we transition to more real content, the better.