I meant that in relation to sybil attacks. You keep taking my words out of context in order to prove your point, which is counterproductive.

You've proved my point again, by the way:

The definition of a sibyl attack is where you gain additional leverage by using more than one account than you would have had if you just used one account.

Curation rewards are exactly the same when voting with multiple accounts, and so is the amount you reward you give or take away.

Curation rewards differ depending on the amount of vote weight you have, we all know this. So, if someone who has different vote weights, across multiple accounts, and who is engaged in collective voting with those accounts, they are essentially manipulating the reward pool for their own benefit, and that, by definition, is a sybil attack against the platform.

You need to think before responding again, or at least consider the entire sentence as it is, because your complete lack of reasoning has us repeating ourselves.