You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: I'm interviewing Bitcoin Cash's Roger Ver in a "First on Steemit" segment

in #steemit7 years ago

Take a look for yourself with the full context:

Sort:  

Effing Roger! The $36 vote on your comment shows that you are really sorry how you handled the situation. ;P Not sure if you are aware about it but in the pronouns debate the argument "If you say someone you dont want to be called X, they should not call you X" is the losing side.

Anyways, I think there is a lot of shady shit going on in Crypto and you being a little emotional is not really a good reason to not hold BCH, but that is exactly what many in the BTC community did and still do.

I for one will only be buying Litecoin as a BTC alternative.. Forget Bcash.

Roger ought to take some cues from Charlie Lee. Charlie is what an honest spokesman for a coin should look like. Extremely intelligent, humble, calm.. basically everything that Roger shows himself not to be.

Welp as I said I never looked too deep into all the drama and I was aware that the video I linked is strongly edited to portrait a certain picture of you.

I actually wrote a post a month ago that is quite positive on BCH https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@thatgermandude/why-i-am-sceptical-towards-btc-classic-and-hodl-my-bch

I don't think you should judge a product by the character of the people promoting it and while I do think that having a thick skin is important, I understand that for you Bitcoin Cash is just not some random internet debate, so maybe it is unfair to demand for you to stay emotionless about it.

Looking forward to the second interview with Pakman where you discuss more about politics, I would love to jump into that discussion in the comments.