It appears to me that @freedom is operating within the consensus rules of the STEEM network.
Delegation is in the code. SBD is in the code. Trading delegation for SBD is a Free Market Activity. I don't tell a user what to do with his Bitcoin. I see no need to dictate what a user of the STEEM network decides to do with his Mined, Earned, or Bought stake.
Downvotes are in the code.
See people? Be like @seablue and follow him and maybe you will also get carpet bombed with delicious upvotes :D
Thank you, sir. I appreciate your encouragement.
Sounds like a good way to create a Black Market in Delegation.
wow you are right! Black Market delegation haha darkpool for delegation!
I'm not sure you even need to see it is a black market. A perfectly visible, white market in delegation serves exactly the same purpose.
It's not like any delegation transfers are immediately visible on the blockchain, anyway. To have a proper black market you would have to have an exchange that takes the information off of this blockchain and puts it either into fiat currency only known on an exchange or the same for some other cryptocoin.
Which I'm sure has already happened.
And vote negation should be in the code.
Agreed with you. I think they should make way for their ownself for analyzing the market.