I wonder how much it would take to make bot owners take some responsibility for the crap their vote bot upvotes? The ROI on vote bot usage is already marginally low. So not much should be needed in terms of random downvotes of unmoderated vote bot upvoted content to push the ROI to negative. Now what if we, instead of spending SBD on vote bots ourselves, would rent delegated SP and use that SP to randomly downvote bot upvoted content, moving on to different bots when the bot owner pledges to at least do some moderation on upvoted content.
Seems to me that relatively little downvote power should be needed to impact the business model for unmoderated upvote bots. If that impact is high enough to make bot owners consider moderating their bot in order to limit the phenomenon of crap by the same accounts being bot upvoted month after month, that I think would be an action worth coordinating.
Maybe I'm just being naive here, but from a ROI point of view, it seems attenuative downvotes using rented delegations might carry quite some leverage against unmoderated bots that might be user in an attempt to make those bots moderated.