I think @abit responding is proof your opinions are considered, and I'm responding here too 🙃

All of your questions are basically the Requisite of Communication challenge, probably with a bit of Don't experiment on me. The first was probably the most detailed and important challenge of the post, so I feel it's dealt with. There's a lot on the second too. Also, @abit has actually responded, so while we can't require communication, you've actually got it here voluntarily, and elsewhere I saw from some of your comments.

To iterate the main point of the post, if we support freedom in general, we have to allow for whales to act freely within the parameters of Steem. If these parameters are found to be lacking in some way, they should be changed. I think you're calling for what most people are, power coming hand in hand with responsibility.

For the record, I don't think adjusting the vote power curve (or a similar change) will really deal with this. While there's clearly support for some kind of responsibility requirement for large stakeholders, I'm not sure how it could be implemented fairly. I'll continue to think on this.