I never mentioned bankrupt at all. But i can account for 30m us$ worth of transfers out to exchanges, so we know steemit inc is not bankrupt. We are asking you to be transparent. Simple. No need to cloak it with off topic replies. You either have something to hide or you don't.
I am on STEEMs side and have spent many hours talking down unhappy users. So let me be as clear as you were, I am an auditor, CPA accountant and have a keen interest in data. I have an investment and stake in the blockchain and don't want an investment in a company like yours. With or without due diligence. The request for a list of accounts is simple, not complex.
Posted using Partiko Android
The request isn't complicated and its rebuff isn't either. Steemit, Inc. is a private company that will choose to do most things privately, as it's entitled to do.
So you are not willing to publish a list for transparency then? I think this speaks a volume on how little respect you have for this community. Arrogance and alienating allies is not the way forward. Neither is hiding things.
There's nothing in this aimed to alienate -- it's aimed to make sure there is 100% respect for the distinction between Steem and Steemit.
I respectfully disagree, your tone and choice of wording is extremely alienating. So is lack of transparency.
I see a future poli-tician in the making with ned, he certainly avoids questions like one, and he is oh so skilled at deflection techniques, ned for president 2020 anyone?
You are correct, and in 2020? abso-fukkin-lutely not!
lol.
You just REALLY fucked up @ned muh boi. REAL bad.
Your company is done now for sure after this ridiculous display, but with you at the helm, it always was.
Yes your private company has a right to be private. Unfortunately, choosing to exercise that right here basically just doomed you forever.
Mark my words now, even though you never have before except to censor myself and others like me, who hold you accountable for claiming and controlling the throne, then pissing it away.
Fail. Of a large order of magnitude. Short sighted, amatuer and obvious. No investor will ever take you seriously again.
His company may be screwed, but he ain't never going to let go of the large stake.
Either way, he poises himself for success when the community rallies to save their investments and build the space.
If I had 50M+ SP, I wouldn't even sell all of it. I would just sit there and let others build for me. At worst, I sell for pennies since they were ninja mined anyways.
Yeah, that part is pretty clear, and all the more reason he's being a total amateur idiot. The people that can build it for him, into something more than pennies, have already smelled the bullshit he excretes and left the building. Some of us are still just here to watch it burn in the same way Ripley's Believe it or Not and PT Barnum enticed audiences with freakshows and circuses.
Speaking of bread and circuses, useless, derivative, unimaginative, blatantly stolen from a former steemian's idea of a card game, anyone?
As this is the second time I see you saying the card game idea would've been stolen I want to chime in.
No idea who the former steemian you reference to was, but I bet it's not been the only one having that thought. In fact, I mentioned it as a possible use case quite in the beginning of steem myself.
Just because it crossed my mind and I maybe even wrote it on chain (not sure, may have been a chat) I would never think of steemmonsters having stolen something. On the contrary - I'm happy someone with the necessary skills showed up to create it! Ideas are worthless without execution.
Yep he is just piece of shit, end of story.
I just saw this about the British PM. I had a deja vu moment.
@ned Your choice of words & lack of disclosure alienate everyone who has put time into this site. If steemit is a private company, who are its customers? Who is paying you? What is steemit without its content creators/investors?
Try to see things from the perspective of the thousands of people who have chosen to put effort into a platform marketed as decentralized.
Management of steemit should aim to be decentralized. What’s the point of a crypto & blockchain blogsite if they are going to be run more poorly, with less transparency than the Fed or fakebook?
CEOs need to be able to see multiple perspectives. Basing decisions on personal gain will not get you very far in the crypto community. Nor will using disrespectful language & policies towards those who have worked on & marketed this platform with their own work & currency.
There is huge opportunity for steemit if you get yourself off your Kings throne & think long term. Decentralize power, see the value in users & build for the long term.
Otherwise more will power down every time you speak about rights & privacy & you will soon be left with total power & control over a lonely site no one else wants anything to do with.
Content creators and investors are what give value to Steemit inc's holdings(STEEM) by continuously selling you are damaging their investment and a means of income even more so in this turbulent market with so few buyers in crypto price is being pulled lower than if Steemit inc wasnt selling.
how can you state you have no obligation to the thousands of users who have made you and your associates rich?