"But how many people will read great but little bit boring analysis about 19th century literature in some little country? And how much money can author of this post get on steemit? The answer is ZERO and it will be worse when kittens and puppies comes with full strength."
This isn't correct also. This post demonstrate that. You've earned much more with this prolix post than many together of mine microposts :-) Anyway you've pointed out a great Steemit issue, the creation of groups and channels as before of you someone did as in this great post https://steemit.com/steemit/@cryptoctopus/steemit-can-t-grow-right-now-here-s-why#@oneshot/re-cryptoctopus-steemit-can-t-grow-right-now-here-s-why-20170402t082236643z
Really great comments. Thank you for your work. I will read linked post and correct mistakes. I know that in my post are mistakes and maybe i could wait some time with this type of post, but this is really subject which is important for me.
I read post you suggested and it is great. But for me - channels and communities are only part of solution. I think that community of 2000 people can be as valuable as community of 20000 people. For example community which will be discussing scientific problems, but as I understand current system on steemit they will not have chance to earn some reasonable money on steemit for their work. No, when here comes Coca Cola and Jay Z and other celebrieties. What I was suggesting is protect some communities about which we think that are valuable for society, give them fixed share of Steem value and let them to divide this share only inside community. Sorry, my English is really terrible :
Here me also! :-)